It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: JadeStar
Such ideas will be quaint as we will probably be post-human by then.
Okay. In the future, all technological 'space-faring civilisations' will be post-scarcity, 'post-human' and there'll be no irrational actions or conflict whatsoever to justify laws.
How idealistic.
originally posted by: infinityorder
At this pace, this conversation will be relevant when we reach the stars 800,000,000 million years from now.
You killed your own argument.
And there's nothing utopian about it. It's no more utopian than if someone said 500 years ago: "In the future, i think things like scavenging for food daily will be obsolete. People will be able to eat anything they want from anywhere in the world."
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: JadeStar
Ahhh okay. So instead of saying you know it to be an incorrect quote, we do the "source that now" song and dance.
How very quaint and human
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: JadeStar
And with that
You killed your own argument.
And there's nothing utopian about it. It's no more utopian than if someone said 500 years ago: "In the future, i think things like scavenging for food daily will be obsolete. People will be able to eat anything they want from anywhere in the world."
"Oh I am the only one who has the right answers." and then not knowing how people around 1515 already had almost world-spanning trading routes, is just why nobody will ever say you are right...
[SNIP]
To a person like you 500 years ago that would have seemed pie-in-the sky idealistic but in reality it was just the inevitable result of ongoing trends.
An economy not based on scarcity is as strange a concept to you and many other people as our current supermarkets would be to someone 500 years ago.
[...]I suspect this may be the natural order of things in the galaxy.
As I said, we astronomers see no evidence of grand space battles, death stars and the like.
However I suspect when we have technology capable of imaging the fine details of exoplanets with resolution down to the size of a small car that we may find plenty of necro-worlds. [...]I brought this topic up when I had lunch with Seth Shostak from the SETI Institute and he agreed.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: JadeStar
Ahhh okay. So instead of saying you know it to be an incorrect quote, we do the "source that now" song and dance.
How very quaint and human
Again, if you or anyone else allege Carl Sagan said something which I know to be incorrect then it is your responsibility not mine to source your quote when prompted.
It's common courtesy.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: JadeStar
To a person like you 500 years ago that would have seemed pie-in-the sky idealistic but in reality it was just the inevitable result of ongoing trends.
An economy not based on scarcity is as strange a concept to you and many other people as our current supermarkets would be to someone 500 years ago.
I think your comments are based on assumptions.
You assume that I'm uneducated and scientifically illiterate. You appear to assume that I've never studied history, psychology or read a science paper...let alone understood one.
You also seem to assume that your view is cast in stone and that those who disagree must be lacking information. What's worse is the way you have 'predicted' the future, with no caveats, when the only limits to the OP's topic are those of remaining reasonable and scientifically grounded.
[...]I suspect this may be the natural order of things in the galaxy.
It's good to see a degree of uncertainty amidst the declarations and prophetic assertions.
As I said, we astronomers see no evidence of grand space battles, death stars and the like.
Who is talking about death stars or grand space battles? Does anyone on Earth see evidence of such things? Is this another assumption? I argued that irrational actors in technological civilisations would commit acts that would necessitate laws and, by extension, 'police.'
However I suspect when we have technology capable of imaging the fine details of exoplanets with resolution down to the size of a small car that we may find plenty of necro-worlds. [...]I brought this topic up when I had lunch with Seth Shostak from the SETI Institute and he agreed.
Anyone following the Kepler Mission and crossing their fingers for the JWST share the same hopes. Did Shostak 'agree' or has he already read papers by guys like Annis, Papagiannis and Livio? I'm stoked that you had lunch with a guy many of us admire and yet the idea of searching for evidence of ETI in the Cosmos preceded your dinner date by several decades.
You're usually a member who I admire for sharing their expertise and keeping people up to date on new developments in the search for new worlds. ATS is improved (imho) by your contributions and there's always an interest in science around here. This is the first time I've taken exception to your posts and it's because you are better than this.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: JadeStar
Such ideas will be quaint as we will probably be post-human by then.
Okay. In the future, all technological 'space-faring civilisations' will be post-scarcity, 'post-human' and there'll be no irrational actions or conflict whatsoever to justify laws.
How idealistic.
You see it as idealism. I see it as the natural and logical progression of outcomes and current trends, some of which reach back over 1,000 years.
It's just the trajectory we are on if one looks at the big picture and a wider view of time beyond their own life span.
And there's nothing utopian about it. It's no more utopian than if someone said 500 years ago: "In the future, i think things like scavenging for food daily will be obsolete. People will be able to eat anything they want from anywhere in the world."
To a person like you 500 years athey controlled the that would have seemed pie-in-the sky idealistic but in reality it was just the inevitable result of ongoing trends.
An economy not based on scarcity is as strange a concept to you and many other people as our current supermarkets would be to someone 500 years ago.
Scarcity and competition for resources have been all that humanity has known afterall.
To suggest we may be moving beyond scarcity to the common person seems utopian. But as our futurist friend from 500 years ago would have observed the same trends which would lead to supermarkets would not necessarily end with us. Time marches on.
Our futurist friend from 500 years ago would have been mocked by his or her peers for suggesting people might eat anything they want at any hour of the day or night just as Giordano Bruno was mocked and persecuted by people even in educated circles and eventually killed by the Catholic church who thought his suggestions of many worlds like earth orbiting other suns was ridiculous, sacrilegious and lacked "common sense".
Futurism often is at odds with "human nature" and "common sense" but such extrapolation often ends up correct.
At about the same time that we're beginning to look at transitioning beyond a scarcity based economy (for instance I live in a city with an actual asteroid mining company, Planetary Resources) we are also on the verge of unleashing transformative technologies which will re-define what it means to be human and that is why I suspect this may be the natural order of things in the galaxy.
It would not shock me if most of the aliens who can travel the stars are post-biological for a number of very solid reasons.
As I said, we astronomers see no evidence of grand space battles, death stars and the like. However I suspect when we have technology capable of imaging the fine details of exoplanets with resolution down to the size of a small car that we may find plenty of necro-worlds. Planets which killed themselves through nuclear, biological or chemical warfare. Or perhaps through environmental collapse. I brought this topic up when I had lunch with Seth Shostak from the SETI Institute and he agreed.
And on the other side of that abyss I suspect that we'll also see planets of endless wonders and marvels from old civilizations which escaped "The Great FIlter".
If I am right, perhaps humanity will as well.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: JadeStar
And with that
You killed your own argument.
And there's nothing utopian about it. It's no more utopian than if someone said 500 years ago: "In the future, i think things like scavenging for food daily will be obsolete. People will be able to eat anything they want from anywhere in the world."
"Oh I am the only one who has the right answers." and then not knowing how people around 1515 already had almost world-spanning trading routes, is just why nobody will ever say you are right...
[SNIP]
I wasn't talking about trade routes. I was talking about 24 hour supermarkets.
Point lost and I am done communicating with you as you've been abusive.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: JadeStar
I've just realised that none of us in the thread have considered misunderstandings or misinterpretations as sources of potential conflict for future 'space-faring civilisations.' Here we are, embodying such things, and thankfully able to move on and forget about them.
If you do take a break, don't stay away for long.
With respect,
K
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: JadeStar don't you dare go for too long your posts and debate are appreciated.
Mtheory is bs.....
All it takes to make m theory work is adding in an extra dimension every time something doesn't add up, ie it is bs.
Newton was so good with a mathematical tool he invented called 'Calculus' that he was able to figure out that the orbit of a planet or moon was an ellipse in relation to the mass of an object at the then called foci. I bring this up simply because there are certain constants in all dimensions and the amount of gravity leakage form the Bulk is one of those constants; unless the Banes touch, which if they do, it then causes all of what we consider creation.