It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: buster2010
Rooseveldt deliberately let a bombing happen.
Eisenhower took orders from the uN to stop commies
Reagan Grenada,invaded by cuban forces,covertly
Bush('s) did Panama,Desert Storm and the 2nd gulf war. ALL authorized by CONGRESS
the rest were either police actions or presidential manuevering. NOT authorized by congress.
Which president keeps releasing enemy combatants and terrorists back on to the battlefield?
Obama's sympathies lie with Muslims Theocrats (remember the now defeated Arab Spring), it is his administration that is pushing for massive destabilization of the ME, by pulling US Forces out to enable groups like ISIS to take control.
Obama is doing everything in his power to finance extreme Islamists (like the half a billion dollars he wanted to give directly to ISIS a year ago) and topple Assad to further increase destabilization and increase the stranglehold of groups like ISIS.
and nasty old FOX news didn't make that up.
originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: Strawberry88
Did the Ukranians say they were going to come to the US and cut Obama's head off?
Did the Russians say the were going to come to the US and impose their Caliphate here?
Because if they didn't, as ISIS did, it would almost seem like you are comparing apples and oranges in a ham handed attempt to downplay the danger we are facing from ISIS.
originally posted by: OneManArmy
No, this is a boogeyman halfway across the world that cannot possibly do this to you because you are not in Iraq or Syria.
originally posted by: Nyiah
What was that? No, and there's a difference? Since when, and do clarify what makes the filmed shooting murder of someone stateside less worthy of the media circus than the Jordanian being cooked alive is.
American public isn't allowed to see an American killed by ISIS, but they have no problem showing a foreigner. I guess Fox figures it wasn't as gruesome as seeing a U.S. citizen in the same circumstance.
I DON’T AGREE THEY SHOULD SHOW THIS DISGUSTING MURDER AND TORTURE OF A HUMAN BEING.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: ColeYounger
It's the headline from the article
Its also the truth. This is a snuff film
Most people don't seem to mind
If you can't understand why I would need to present this the way I did - then I guess you're missing the point. That being - Fox news has not just done something tasteless - this is outrageously crossing a line of decency
Did you think I shouldn't have used the word snuff? Not bolded the headline? Not posted the still?
You tell me - how should this story be covered?
But it is not your right to stop people who wish to view it.
*meh* Change the channel.
Apparently, Fox feels that imagining the worst horrors humanity has to offer is not enough anymore. I have to wonder why
What say you ATS - is this OK?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
The lil baby public must be sheltered from reality in your view, that seems to be your message.
People need to get angry about things that deserve getting angry about.
Besides, people with your extreme point of view that hates anything not bowing at the liberal alter would never watch what Fox shows anyway so why you mad bro?