It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Ontology of Happiness

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 04:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Itisnowagain

I am just trying to help you, unasked for maybe, but you are so obviously wasting potential, because you are stuck. You are (in a different frame) Sheldon in this scenario and please watch and think about it. I just want you to reach a higher ground.




posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 04:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Astrocyte
Happiness is an Emergent Property of Human Relationships

Yes. Ontologically speaking, happiness depends upon other people.


It seems as though CONFLICT is the emergent property of Human Relationship.
If 'other people' are not imagined then there would be 'relating.
When another is assumed it seems there must be the destruction of other.'


edit on 6-2-2015 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 04:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Itisnowagain

I am just trying to help you, unasked for maybe, but you are so obviously wasting potential, because you are stuck.

Thank you for trying to help but you must realize that you can only see from where you are seeing from.
All feelings arise where you are and are fleeting.

edit on 6-2-2015 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 04:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Itisnowagain

and again, you are miraculously spot on and entirely besides the point at the same time


Relations result=> e-merge=> conflate., so they result out of two opinions, the lowest reachable common ground. the common denominator, i don't know how to make you understand...

But you are agressively defensive. That shows how you endlessly prove to yourself your own perception => you judge. That's where all the conflict comes from, i was just trying to ease your pain with a new access point to harmony. But you want to dominate, not integrate. So i really don't know why i even bother.



posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 04:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
That's where all the conflict comes from, i was just trying to ease your pain with a new access point to harmony. But you want to dominate, not integrate. So i really don't know why i even bother.

You are trying to ease my pain?????
You cannot feel 'my pain' - you can only feel what you feel - you are assuming other!!!

'Relating' is one.
'Relationship' is two.

When there is two there will be conflict.
When the two are found to be one the kingdom shall be revealed.

I don't know why you are bothering to cure the suffering of 'others'.
Seek the one that is suffering and the sufferer will vanish.
edit on 6-2-2015 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 04:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Yeah no. i already got it, but you don't. re-lated, comes from the latin word latere. Maybe you go and check that out, try to think for yourself, for a change and don't take every bs as given law, when it is just you chosing to be blind.



posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 05:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Yeah no. i already got it, but you don't. re-lated, comes from the latin word latere.

The word is 'relatING'.
Relating happens in the moment - it is one.
Relationship is with something other than - which is conflict - when there is more than one there is division.

Contemplate the definition of 'relating'.



posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 05:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple
When there appears to be more than one there appears to be attack and defence.



posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 05:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Itisnowagain


and


and i can think of a million more things that can emerge from the relation of two beings: love, fun, conversations, a nice round of table top games...
But you find what you seek. Or reflect what you project. I don't know, i obviously speak a different language than you do.



posted on Feb, 6 2015 @ 05:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple

and i can think of a million more things that can emerge from the relation of two beings: love, fun, conversations, a nice round of table top games...

All this happens as relating.
Relating is what there is always - it does not have to be sought.

Speaking does seem to divide relating into 'subject/object' but prior to any word/concept (speaking) what is there?


edit on 6-2-2015 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)







 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join