It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: iDope
a reply to: wildespace
I do appreciate those HiRes Images you provided, they give much more insight to this picture. NASA really likes to get pictures of every single crater at Hi Res from multiple angles, That is impressive. Just as Impressive how they fake they moon landing. The only reason I created this post was because this face looks more like a face than the original and more famous face seen. And yet there is not even an eye or mouth. Thus, I dont think it could be Pareidolia, but maybe Apophenia (a pattern in random data). A child will not smile to a side profile of a face, only when looking straight on, thus being we look for frontal features of a face, not like what is shown in OP picture.
Also, I thought it should be shown for the reason of the other images shown very near by that make it correlate to being significant.
It's not like I was pointing out something that looks like a refridgerator or an ironing board. The fact that anyone would look at this picture and see a face or crashed disc of some sort seemed like a relevant topic. People tell me to look at the man in the moon, and what do I see? Nothing.
Do you want to next describe the Nazca lines as being created by Earth's vibrations and shown through the sand by act of Cymatics?
I never claimed that these were created by ET's I just claimed that it was a face. There are not many craters that show an outline such as that, in fact I have never seen another one. So forgive me for not checking another agencies higher resolution images that have been overtly doctored countless times, and rely on that single image.
And noone I have shown it to does not see a face. I don't even prime their subconcious to see a face. I don't say "Hey, Look at this face on Mars!" If I would show it to anyone they would see it, unless they have never seen a man or a bald one at that.
So, on that note, every news story on this site sourced by any main stream media is false, unless it can be sourced by somones HiRes image and they were there in person and wrote their own unbiased report not associated with any media outlet. Any video proclaiming a truth about any scientific subject must be supported by inconclusive findings only supported by government agencies (since their sources have always been right).
originally posted by: boymonkey74
Read the thread and yes it is a crater.
The human mind is programmed to see faces in things natural it is called Pareidolia.
Yes from one angle it looks like a face but it is a natural crater not made by anything but a rock hitting the surface.
Also OP to accuse all the space agencies of covering up stuff just makes people turn off to your views.
Show us the evidence the photos have been doctored Oh and yes we did goto the moon.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: iDope
It is purely fiction, but I just thought how super truly amazing it would be, if we would go there with archaeologists and find out:
Maybe I have to write a book now. On the side.
Damn it's already in the pool of thoughtsmash. Too late.
Holy #: I was watching this (just for imaginery-mind-blowing-recreational-purposes) and it hit me, what if these stories are true? what if all the mixed-beings are an indication for inter-species-procreation? What if different beings arrived and mixed with us, because their home world was dead(Mars) a planet that had an atmosphere once, but was faster spinning and that means it lived faster=>on a different frequency. That's where all the focusing energy rituals are coming from, but it gets weaker and weaker, like our DNA, each copy contains less energy flowing through less information?.