It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: WarminIndy
I couldn't care less what Fundamentalists think...
Judgement Day will come for all of us & I fear none but Allah!
His protection is all I need.
Finally, before we part ways for your transgressions & false statements...
Give me a Surah that says women must wear a Burkha that covers their face...
Don't tell me what has been attributed to Aisha, if it's not in the Quran (which it isn't) don't waste my time.
The idea that it is obligatory is still being debated among Scholars...
That should give you a hint as to whether it's in the Quran or not (it's not)!
“O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies (i.e. screen themselves completely). That will be better, that they should be known (as free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed. And Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” [al-Ahzab: 59]
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: ketsuko
"Permitted" & "Obligatory" are not the same thing...
The Quran says Allah is merciful & forgiving and that the Hearts intentions are what weigh up on Judgement Day...
So while the lie under threat of death (permitted not obligatory) would go against...
The intention behind the transgression would also be weighed on the Scales of Judgement...
Now compare that to the "all encompassing & loving God of the Bible" who would only weigh up the lie according to the people in this thread...
Who is more merciful to people?
Now before people say that "but you said only Shia believe they're permitted to lie to save themselves"...
That is not what I said...
I said it is a Shia Tradition, others do not necessarily follow what is "permissible" as opposed to what is "obligatory".
I also never said the liar wouldn't be punished for it...
It will be seen as a transgression, and when all good & bad is weighed up, if that lie pushes the scales in a negative direction despite whatever the persons intentions...
They will be punished however Allah wills.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: FlyersFan
Messages "revealed" about Muhammad decades later by people who never met him...
Not messages revealed to Muhammad about the falsified works of another Prophet by another group who had no contact with the divine...
Which was a well accepted notion in that Prophets time...
Only a select few bought into the whole Divinity at the time of said Prophet...
You act as if everybody was convinced of these falsehoods until Muhammad came along...
Which is disingenuous because there were a great many more at the time who didn't believe it rather than those who did.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: WarminIndy
That's for you to find out on Judgement Day.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: WarminIndy
Your obscene postulating is becoming a nuisance...
You know full well I'm not saying Aisha never met Muhammad...
I'm saying that the Hadith in their current state are no more trustworthy than the Bible in my mind...
According to Hadith Aisha said that Prophet Muhammad used to piss sitting down...
Should I start doing that as well?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Not messages revealed to Muhammad about the falsified works of another Prophet by another group who had no contact with the divine...
But we are not messengers of God, nor can we live up to any interpretation of the Prophet Jesus...
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
You can keep saying "people wrote this at the time of Jesus so it's true"...
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: WarminIndy
Went back on what word?
Where did I use taqiyya?
Why do you keep moving the goal posts?
& yes proclaiming that I've used taqiyya is not only insulting, but I believe that to be the intention of your accusation!
Your approach reeks of goading.
This thread has no discussion to offer...
I'm gonna catch up on other threads now.
Allahu Akbar!
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
There will be no "rape of Christians & Jews"
You aren't telling the truth. The Mahdi will offer Islam to the Jews and Christians and if they accept they will be spared, if they reject they will be murdered. Your faith also says that the trees will call out "Servant of allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and murder him him."
So which camp are you? That the bloodbath is to happen now to hasten the return of the Mahdi or is the bloodbath supposed to happen after he arrives?
This is a strange type of Muslim...he doesn't accept the authority of Hadith and he would not be selfish in his salvation.
He's very strange. He can give up his salvation to save someone else, isn't that the strangest Muslim saying you have heard in a while?