It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Alif, Lam, Meem.
This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a guidance for those conscious of Allah -
Who believe in the unseen, establish prayer, and spend out of what WE have provided for them,
And if you are in doubt about what WE have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah , if you should be truthful.
And [mention] when WE said to the angels, "Prostrate before Adam"; so they prostrated, except for Iblees. He refused and was arrogant and became of the disbelievers.
And WE said, "O Adam, dwell, you and your wife, in Paradise and eat therefrom in [ease and] abundance from wherever you will. But do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers."
Women wouldn't be allowed to speak in public within weeks if that happened. Then this lady wouldn't have even been able to get up and interrupt the other lady as neither would have been allowed near the microphone in the first place.
originally posted by: OrphanApology
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
Actually if any of those religions were taken literally based on the writings and applied to laws and public behavior they would not be allowed to speak.
Actually the US was created by Christians for Christians.
originally posted by: beezzer
I would hope that everyone would defend her right to free expression, and not specifically what she said.
But I guess not.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: olaru12
Just defending free expression.
I've not ONCE stated that I either agreed or disagreed with the content of what she said.
I've only defended her right to say it.