It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It would seem that calling it fake outrage does nothing but create a partisan wedge. It seems that this should be an issue everyone agrees on. But no one can stop arguing long enough to try. Even when there is nothing to really argue over.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Jamie1
I don't see the problem.
If people sitting watching their televisions are so ignorant and apathetic that they vote based on 30 second commercials, then so be it.
The problem isn't the big money.
It's the small minds who are easily influenced by the big money.
again...big money.
Our populace has been purposefully "dumbed down" via a concerted effort at the national level.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: neo96
So "the moronic masses" are happy to sell their votes.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Teachers unions....i wish that we were ready to deal with that. But that problem is completely dwarfed by the negative impact of the game of purse strings played over the standardized testing scores.
originally posted by: Aazadan
Two points here about the OP
#1. When is what the Koch brothers doing considered sedition? We have a well funded group, that is purchasing votes to get their people in office, running domestic propaganda machines, and trying to dismantle the government. Say what you will of people like Soros, Buffet, and Gates but they are spending their money to improve the government not abolish it.
#2. Do people not grasp the seriousness of what this OP is talking about? We live under a system of Democracy, each person is supposed to have an equal vote. Lets remove partisianship from the debate and talk about things only in the framework of Republicans. Two people are spending more than every other man, woman, and child in their party combined. What are their chances of having their agenda pressed, their stance on policies codified into official doctrine, national priorities set to benefit them, and state representatives looking out for their interests? Now what are the chances of your representatives looking out for your interests, making sure the country is going in a direction that you want it to, and writing legislation that isn't written at your expense?
People here like to talk about the shadowy TPTB that act as the real power behind the throne our elected officials sit on. Well, you're looking at it right here. To the Republican party the Kochs are TPTB, and if we take what the courts said that money=free speech, by virtue of the amount of money they spent and the idea of majority rule their speech wins. You have no speech, and thus effectively no representation.
originally posted by: luthier
Not even close. All those billionairs you mention do not helpnthe government or society or they wouldnt be billionairs. The supreme court is who to blame. How about Obama's 2 billion where did it come from public donations? Nope places like monsanto which are far worse than the Kochs..its all dispicable.
Oh yeah the Kochs funded and got Bill Clinton elected too in case you forgot that. He is a democrat right? The guy the signed the telecomunication act and consoldated all the media outlets to a few. And nafta,...etc etc.
The only good democrat was JFK, Carter intended well but,..
The last decent republican was Eisenhower. Now both parties are the same self serving monster.
The billionaire Koch brothers plan to spend $889 million in the 2016 elections, twice what their network spent in 2012, according to the reports published on Monday. “In the last presidential election, Obama and Romney raised about $1 billion each. The Koch brothers, the second wealthiest family in America, now say they will raise nearly $1 billion for the 2016 elections. When one family can raise as much as an entire party, the system is broken. This is oligarchy, not democracy,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders. “We must overturn Citizens United,” added Sanders, who last week filed a constitutional amendment to undo the 2010 Supreme Court ruling that struck down laws limiting how much corporations and wealthy individuals may invest in campaigns.
originally posted by: GodEmperor
a reply to: Jamie1
Interesting points.
However, wealth does not equate success. Unless you would agree that drug cartels should have more influence on politics than average Americans.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: links234
This Is Not Democracy
Bernie Sanders' statement on the announcement by Charles and David Koch that they'll contribute $889 million during the 2016 election cycle.
I said the same thing when the current potus raised $2 BILLION dollars to buy the last two elections.
I smell FAKE outrage.