It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The medical doctor stated that he DETECTED no evidence of respiration or cardiac impulse. In other words, the person seemed dead.
His inability to detect respiration or cardiac impulse does not mean it wasn't present. That is the very reason why there is a distinction between clinical death and actual death.
However, you may, at your option, believe the fairytale version of these stories rather than accept the fact that doctors make mistakes.
originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
a reply to: Tangerine
The medical doctor stated that he DETECTED no evidence of respiration or cardiac impulse. In other words, the person seemed dead.
Um No. No cardiac function and no respiration means that they ARE dead.
His inability to detect respiration or cardiac impulse does not mean it wasn't present. That is the very reason why there is a distinction between clinical death and actual death.
Wrong again. I'm pretty sure that if an EEG cant pick it up and a mirror to the nose or a stethoscope to the chest hears nothing then there is nothing there. In many cases rigor mortis and palor mortis had set in many of these people. Maybe you should clear it up by asking your physician how they pronounce people dead.
However, you may, at your option, believe the fairytale version of these stories rather than accept the fact that doctors make mistakes.
Well thank you for your permission for me to believe what I like. I grant you permission to do the same.
And you're preaching to the choir about doctors making mistakes. I was told 3 and a half years ago that I had a few months to live at most...and here I am still. Doctors say I am a miracle (a word that doctors almost never use) and the fact that I am on no clinical preventative cancer drugs confounds them. I am proof that things happen that doctors don't understand all the time. Call it what you will but to me, that is God and nothing but God.
So keep sticking your fingers in your ears and ignoring what the people who have actually died say about it, in the end we all die and until then arguing about with people like you that absolutely refuse to believe becasue they would rather cling to the notion that there is no God, no creator and all of this just happened one day and made itself.
Now you're bringing religion into it. That explains it. You can't distinguish between belief and fact.
You can't distinguish between belief and fact.
at all costs, avoid asking your physician or even going so far as to look up the difference between clinically dead and dead.
originally posted by: guitarplayer
There was a study done in the early 1900's where terminal patients were laid on gurnees and weighed before and after death the weight difference was from 1/2 ounce to 1 and 1/4 ounce loss upon death.
www.snopes.com...
a reply to: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: jacobe001
a reply to: Cancerwarrior
There are some that would never accept there is something else after the body dies.
Even if science was able to suspend the life of the body, dissect it piece by piece and then put it back together, and the person awaken, the same people would be saying the person never died.