It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Today, WikiLeaks' lawyers have written to Google and the US Department of Justice concerning a serious violation of the privacy and journalistic rights of WikiLeaks' staff. Investigations editor Sarah Harrison, Section Editor Joseph Farrell and senior journalist and spokesperson Kristinn Hrafnsson have received notice that Google had handed over all their emails and metadata to the United States government on the back of alleged 'conspiracy' and 'espionage' warrants carrying up to 45 years in prison.
Importantly, the warrants reveal for the first time a clear list of the alleged offences the US government is trying to apply in its attempts to build a prosecution against Julian Assange and other WikiLeaks staff. The offences add up to a total of 45 years of imprisonment.
The US government is claiming universal jurisdiction to apply the Espionage Act, general Conspiracy statute and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to journalists and publishers – a horrifying precedent for press freedoms around the world. Once an offence is alleged in relation to a journalist or their source, the whole media organisation, by the nature of its work flow, can be targeted as alleged 'conspiracy'. Julian Assange, WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief said: 'WikiLeaks has out endured everything the Obama administration has thrown at us and we will out endure these latest "offences" too.'
originally posted by: kloejen
Today, WikiLeaks' lawyers have written to Google and the US Department of Justice concerning a serious violation of the privacy and journalistic rights of WikiLeaks' staff. Investigations editor Sarah Harrison, Section Editor Joseph Farrell and senior journalist and spokesperson Kristinn Hrafnsson have received notice that Google had handed over all their emails and metadata to the United States government on the back of alleged 'conspiracy' and 'espionage' warrants carrying up to 45 years in prison.
Importantly, the warrants reveal for the first time a clear list of the alleged offences the US government is trying to apply in its attempts to build a prosecution against Julian Assange and other WikiLeaks staff. The offences add up to a total of 45 years of imprisonment.
The US government is claiming universal jurisdiction to apply the Espionage Act, general Conspiracy statute and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to journalists and publishers – a horrifying precedent for press freedoms around the world. Once an offence is alleged in relation to a journalist or their source, the whole media organisation, by the nature of its work flow, can be targeted as alleged 'conspiracy'. Julian Assange, WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief said: 'WikiLeaks has out endured everything the Obama administration has thrown at us and we will out endure these latest "offences" too.'
Click here to read the full article
This is getting more and more ridicules. Anyone asking questions, edits the questions, publish the questions, ponders the questions, is apparently a potential threat to the mighty US intelligence apparatus.
Google Is Not What It Seems - Julian Assange.
Sure makes a valid point!
In my humble opinion, this is getting out of hand. Who is watching the watchers in this case?
More sources:
The Guardian: WikiLeaks demands answers after Google hands staff emails to US government
Gizmodo: Google Handed Stacks of WikiLeaks Email Straight to the FBI in 2012
Independent: Google secretly handed over WikiLeaks emails and personal data to US government
RT: WikiLeaks ‘astonished and disturbed’: Google gave its major staff data to US govt
originally posted by: kloejen
originally posted by: smurfy
I have some sympathy with how ridiculous it may seem for here but, since the last thread did a runner I need to point out in fairness, that any Blocking appears to be beyond ATS's control, something I didn't know about at the time or had forgotten at time of your other thread, I don't think I forgot, just didn't see the thread I now find here,
www.abovetopsecret.com... where there is an explanation from Springer.
You might keep this thread if there is no direct link to any illegal material I don't know. Tenchnically, now I chew on it, my link was not a direct one anyway. Good luck.
In edit, I see now there is no direct link to what is being called illegal material.
I will add though, while there is some passages taken out of what is considered illegal in Assange's tale, most of the rest is the most telling stuff, and it might be possible to verify it using another search like IX-Quick...Smurfy.
originally posted by: [post=18925621]kloejen
The most interestingly about this whole illegal material nonsense, is Who Determines What Material Is Illegal ?
Who gave them that power?
How can anyone ever discuss anything then? If something later is being deemed "illegal material", will it have retrospective repercussions ?