It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Professor Michael Sword's UFO Files.

page: 6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in


posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 11:37 AM
I've seen some weird lights in the sky, but anymore I just give it a shrug. Their up there and I'm down here, Nothing I can do about it.

posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 06:18 AM

originally posted by: korath

Their up there and I'm down here, Nothing I can do about it.

Hi mate, seems the USAF may have been thinking along the same lines and even 'set up special cameras on its radar screens to keep a pictorial record' - they also admitted to 'charting all flying saucer patterns' to look at possible flight behaviour and characteristics.

Air Force Has Fingers Crossed

posted on Jan, 1 2017 @ 08:06 AM
Rich Reynolds discusses Prof Sword's piece 'UFOs & The Enigma of the United States Navy' which explains how all USAF UFO reports were sent in duplicate to the Navy's Office of Naval Intelligence.

Our colleague Anthony Bragalia came across a posting by Michael Swords [aka The Professor], our favorite UFO geezer and an erudite researchers by any definition, referencing the overlooked (by UFO mavens) U.S. Navy association with and about UFOs.

We've harped on this topic for many years ourselves -- maybe that's where The Professor got his inspiration -- and think UFO aficionados would do well to search for substantial UFO information within the U.S. Navy's panoply of material online and off.

Click HERE for Professor Swords' take on the matter

posted on Jan, 1 2017 @ 10:50 AM
a reply to: Kandinsky

None of those 3 links worked for me my friend.


posted on Jan, 1 2017 @ 11:17 AM
a reply to: mirageman

This question of why the quality of reports seems to be less now than in the "golden" age...its permanently on my mind. I've examined many different theories.

My first theory was that the lessening was proportional to the cell phone adoption curve.

Sure...could be...but hard to prove...

Another theory is simply that the quality of the human imagination has either decreased, or that the human imagination has become controlled...

Which leads me to my latest favorite theory...

"Chariots of the Gods" was published in 1968 and that nonsense has captured the imagination of many.

If the aliens are does that affect the human imagination?

Well if nothing else...they won't be simple metal disks from the planet venus...

(Like "Golden Age" sightings).

On the subject of Venus and what not...most people don't realize that it was Blavatsky and Theosophy which started all this aliens ("Ascended Masters") coming from local planets and from Sirius, etc.

I'd say that the Ancient Alien memes have finally conquered the early Theosophy Memes.

One might also note, that good quality sightings have faded with the decrease in certain kinds of occult new age practices. (Also hard to correlate i know).

But i suspect that the major reasons for the decrease of quality incidents is mainly UFO phenomenon all filter through the human mind in one way or another.


edit on 1-1-2017 by KellyPrettyBear because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 1 2017 @ 11:33 AM
a reply to: karl 12

71 percent of the world is covered by water.

It should not be surprising that we should also look there!

In my view of an ex nuclear engineer...i have to point out that water makes excellent radiation shielding (its used in American nuclear war ships for that purpose).

If "our hypothetical friends" were either photophobic (like in mythological lore), or radiation sensitive (like in my PSPH),

Or simply did not wish to be tracked due to emitted radiation (radiation is present in most of the best cases),

Then deep in the ocean would be an excellent choice for many reasons..


posted on Jan, 1 2017 @ 12:08 PM
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Some mighty fine points there Kev and good old Ivan Sanderson would certainly have agreed.

An almost forgotten gem of UFOlogy...Sanderson reminds us of the hard yet oft-forgotten fact of UFOlogy, which is, most UFOs seem inextricably connected with water - They are very frequently seen entering and leaving water, moving through or above water, and otherwise interacting with water. Sanderson explores all the implications of this, leading him to postulate that most UFOs are actually USOs - Unidentified Submerged Objects, and their pilots, these other intelligences (OINTS), may have evolved alongside of humanity but under the sea.

Forgotten UFO Researcher Ivan T. Sanderson.

Carl Feindt's research is also well worth a read mate (if you've not done so already)!

"UFOs have approximately 75% of this planet in which to operate undetected.Adding another piece to the puzzle. From dissimilar puzzle pieces supplied by ufologists throughout the years of UFO history, a picture is starting to take shape. Ufologist Carl Feindt has not only contributed his own small piece, but he has also connected many of the previous pieces to form an enlightening and highly plausible theory.Feindt’s studies concern Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) that enter and exit the dense medium of water. This aspect aroused his curiosity, because while we humans do not understand alien science, we do know our water. This book contains cases from just about every type of body of water, from puddles to oceans. It opens a long-overlooked door to discover the operating principles of UFOs by closely observing water’s reaction to these craft and finding similarities among cases involving water.“[Carl Feindt] did an excellent job of describing the movement of UFOs in water, entering water, leaving water, and moving above the water...and what the water conditions can tell us about the mechanics of the operation of the vehicles.”

John F. Schuessler, Former International Director of MUFON

'UFOs and Water' ~ Carl W. Feindt.

Cheers and a happy new year!

posted on Jan, 1 2017 @ 12:15 PM
a reply to: karl 12

Excellent references.. Happy new year to you!


posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 09:34 AM
a reply to: karl 12

I skimmed Carl's book.

He is completely duped that aliens in nuts and bolts craft are visiting us,
which is not supported by his data.

As a matter of fact, JV uses similar cases studies to promote his theory,
which has much more merit.

But i very much did enjoy those watery case studies.. that they are
so well documented is quite useful.


posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:30 PM
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Ah yes mate everyone certainly has their opinions when it comes to this subject (Ivan did his fair share of speculating as well) - really do think the USO aspect is a very important part of the UFO subject though and it was nice to read Jacques also describing UFOs emerging from the ocean in the Colares case - as Gordon mentions in the video below "Unquestionably, something very extraordinary is going on and unquestionably it's a very bewildering mystery".


posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 01:25 PM
a reply to: karl 12

I agree that the watery aspect is important.

I find it humorous however, that Carl included an incident which included "dwarves" scurrying about and other incidents which could or did come straight out of fairy lore.

There were also incidents where two people stood right next to the phenomenon and saw completely different things.

Again.. a smoking gun that mundane theories involving "star trek" technology are totally and completely wrong.

Everyone wants to call "them" something different.

But "they" are the contents of the little red wagon.. not the wagon itself.

But also to say that "they" are aliens or gods or demons or what not, is to show supreme

We need to penetrate the deception.

But that is where UFOlogy is at these days.

I do congratulate anyone who does in-depth research however.. Carl put a lot of good
work into his book (which I bought on Kindle).

edit on 2-1-2017 by KellyPrettyBear because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 22 2017 @ 07:08 PM
anyone knows why he doesnt update his blog anymore?!

posted on Sep, 22 2017 @ 07:53 PM
a reply to: humanoidlord

Probably shot down by the MIB.


Or not.

posted on Sep, 23 2017 @ 01:12 AM
a reply to: humanoidlord

His enthusiasm for producing the blog articles ran out. He's still active in the subject and hosts collegiate get-togethers with friends and researchers. He remains an absolute gentleman

posted on Sep, 23 2017 @ 09:23 AM
a reply to: vinifalou

lol no

posted on Sep, 23 2017 @ 09:25 AM
a reply to: Kandinsky

hes one of those rare serious researchers that i have stumbled upon
odd that he has almost none internet presence despite being one of the real scientists on the field

posted on Dec, 24 2017 @ 03:13 AM

originally posted by: Kandinsky
He's still active in the subject and hosts collegiate get-togethers with friends and researchers. He remains an absolute gentleman

Very good to hear that Senor Kandinsky and a happy Christmas to you, him and everybody else

new topics

top topics

<< 3  4  5   >>

log in