It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Automobiles are necessary in most cases for the world to function
BTW - the burning of organic material produces the same 7000 toxic chemcials in smoke
His motives were not to better peoples health but to crush a population.
main cause of Disease was the consumption of triglycerides from animal products
Second-hand smoke is a health danger. I propose that tobacco products only be sold in liquid form with syringes. That way, you can shoot-up all you want so long as you dispose of the needles properly
The difference is that marijuana has health benefits, smoking tobacco has none.
They knew it was lies but it was a fine moral cause - marijuana free society.
However critics of the company see them in a somewhat different light:
"The business of Du Pont has been dangerous from the start"
Philip Mattera, World Class Business, 1992
The company has consistently treated the long-term interests of humanity as largely irrelevant" Curtis Moore, Former Counsel to the US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works,
There is hardly a single chemical toxin in which DuPont has not played a major role in developing. The company pioneered the production of sulphur dioxide, leaded petrol, CFC's and recently deep well injection of hazardous waste. The company then used dubious science, political manipulation and cover up to avoid restrictions on their use.  During its 200 years of existence, DuPont has committed a staggering amount of corporate crimes (far too many to mention here). The following section contains just a selection of these.
Control of the food chain
Moving production to the developing world
Endangering the publics health
Along with the transfat thing that had us all eating poison for some 3 decades before they finally admitted their error
to get up and leave the building on multiple occasions during a meal you have someone who is highly prone to irritability in between fixes.
It's people who insist on indulging in a bad habit in public no matter how much it disturbs others who are self-entitled. You don't realize that because you are a smoker.
Does the public OWN the bar? or the restaurants? When did that happen? Did we take over the mortgages? Do we pay the staff wages? Do we pay the rent or the business taxes.
When did hospitality venues become "publically owned"
Great! So, let's blitz every country in the Western world with gazillions of 3rd world people still struggling to climb out of the stone age, and who view human rights as a quaint cultural oddity.
Got a problem with that, Nazi?
I wouldn't be surprised if in the future, some magical undocumented study comes up saying that smokers, even years after they quit, are somehow hurting everyone's health