It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
When I told an asthmatic to try to smoke a cigarette, I wasn't being rude. I was being kind and advising him that many many asthmatics smoke lightly and are convinced that 1 or 2 cigarettes a day are as effective as Big Pharma drugs. Further, smoking 1 or 2 cigarettes per day have NEVER been linked with any adverse health impacts
originally posted by: anonentity
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
Why don't you strengthen both your respiratory system and your immune system. Have a smoke and be as healthy as a smoker!
That's one of the most stupid things you wrote in this thread.
Having a smoke can kill someone that has asthma, it doesn't "strengthens the respiratory system".
That type of ignorance is the most dangerous, it's the type of ignorance that turns a common person into someone that doesn't mind that other people die or live a much worse life than they could.
He was being humorous, you know what laughter is?
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
so since every asthma sufferer has been advised that they are supposed to avoid tobacco smoke at all costs - it is possible that THIS very person does not know whether tobacco will help or not?
Yes, it is up to each person to know what helps and what makes them worse, but you didn't suggest he tried it to see if it helped, you said:
I suggested he TRY it because he probably hasn't. It is up to each person to know whether exposure helps him or not.
Why don't you strengthen both your respiratory system and your immune system. Have a smoke and be as healthy as a smoker!
In any event, asthmatics - no matter how badly they suffer - have no right to demand control over everyone else's lives, actions and properties.
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
I think I am perfectly aware of my words. And I am battling the tyranny of public health and getting the jack-boot of puritan zealots off my neck
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
The principal is the same whether you personally drive or not.
It is absurd to worry about the smoke generated by 19 grams of dried herbs when cars are so plentiful and spewing 1000s of times the volume of the very same contaminants.
More appropriately, I have as much right to smoke a cigarette in my own home as anyone else to light a candle.
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
If I had a disease that make my life difficult because of loud noises, I would have only two choices. 1. isolate myself with ear phones or 2. going into treatment for my disease by exposing myself to first soft noises, and then ever increasing noises until I could stand loud noises again.
Here is what I would not do: Usurp government power to ban everyone, everywhere in the world from making loud noises because it affects me!
It has been proven, by the experience of the last 70 years, that smoking bans have not helped ANY asthmatics. If anything the problem has worsened. So as the example I gave with noise, it is clear that trying to isolate yourself from anything that MAY aggravate your asthma isn't working.
The only thing left to try is to expose yourself to ever-increasing amounts of smoke in order to strengthen your respiratory system.
I do not think that asthmatics are irrelevant. I am simply point out that your strategy of controlling the behavior and lives of every single person around you, just isn't working.
as you can plainly see from this link- tobacco smoke is just one trigger for asthma (and it isn't even the most common one)
An asthmatic who is not triggered by tobacco smoke, need not concern themselves and try to "avoid" tobacco smoke at all.
It is only a small minority of asthmatics whose attacks are triggered by tobacco smoke.
The theory of exposing yourself to ever-increasing doses of whatever irritate triggers your asthma is a very very well established medical treatment for asthma
www.webmd.com...
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
a reply to: Leonidas
1. Prohibition created disrespect for the law.
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
consider how the teen smoking rate is starting to rise.
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
as you can plainly see from this link- tobacco smoke is just one trigger for asthma.
originally posted by: TiredofControlFreaks
a reply to: Leonidas
Here is what I would not do: Usurp government power to ban everyone, everywhere in the world from making loud noises because it affects me!
originally posted by: anonentity
In countries where the state would pay, it was even better. They skewed the stats to suit the campaign, and vilified smokers, to the point that they were standing outside in the rain in fact dehumanised.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: anonentity
In countries where the state would pay, it was even better. They skewed the stats to suit the campaign, and vilified smokers, to the point that they were standing outside in the rain in fact dehumanised.
That's not true, in Portugal the Social Security pays a large percentage of most medications and 100% of some medications (for diabetes and cancer, for example), and we don't have any vilifying of smokers.