It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
So much time and money could be saved if we could put the war on religion aside and help the most people not just our talking points.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
Civil unions that are equal to marriage does just that.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
Civil unions that are equal to marriage does just that.
So then why the hell are people trying to argue against a solution that would do that.
Civil unions that are equal to marriage does just that. It removes the church and marriage issue from government.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: deadeyedick
Civil unions that are equal to marriage does just that.
This fails to address post facto retardedness like the legislator in the Original Post.
There are also only a handful of states with civil unions and the Federal Government (while I am loath to give them more authority) will need to enforce equality and reciprocity through all states.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
If fedral laws are made making civil unions the same as a marriage then this idiot in the op does not have a problem.
Again the marriage law puts God in government and a civil union law would not.
The county clerks would not have an argument against unions because God is found in the marriage that would be handled by the churches on a chrch by church basis.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: deadeyedick
Religion has the problem they need to get over themselves. Marriage never belonged to religion so why do we need to appease a bunch of whiny crybaby religions?
Here is a thought. How about government officials deal with issues like fixing their state deficits instead of proposing legislation that is unconstitutional and if passed destined to cost their states even more.
I wonder if this Rep has ever claimed they wanted less government interference funny how Reps are so selective with that claim.
originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: deadeyedick
So then why the hell are people trying to argue against a solution that would do that.
Civil unions that are equal to marriage does just that. It removes the church and marriage issue from government.
Ah, now I get it.
What you're saying is that when two people say their vows in front of a minister under the roof of a church and sign a legally binding contract, it's a marriage.
When two people say their vows in front of a Justice of the Peace under the roof of a courthouse and sign a legally binding contract, it's a civil union.
If religion isn't involved, it's not a marriage... therefore it should not be using the word 'marriage'... because it's not.
Gotcha.
originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: deadeyedick
So then why the hell are people trying to argue against a solution that would do that.
Civil unions that are equal to marriage does just that. It removes the church and marriage issue from government.
If religion isn't involved, it's not a marriage... therefore it should not be using the word 'marriage'... because it's not.
The reason the government officials are dealing with this is because right now it is affecting many people.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
The rights of the union would be givin by the government and the blessing from God would come through the church or whatever one would want to recognize as blessing or whatever would give them peace of mind that they are married.
Atheists have been getting married all along. Where was the uproar that they couldn't use the word marriage?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: deadeyedick
The reason the government officials are dealing with this is because right now it is affecting many people.
Even if it is affecting many people so what. I am sure the end of segregation, women's rights, and allowing mixed races to marry also affected many people.
originally posted by: CranialSponge
I'm only civilly unionized with myhusbandspouseco-habitant partner of the opposite sex.