It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: honested3
originally posted by: Jamie1
Arizona St. University now offers a course called "The Problem of Whiteness."
Student James Malone raises this issue:
Student James Malone told Campus Reform that such a course “shows the significant double standard of higher education institutions,” noting that the school “would never allow a class talking about the problem of blackness.”
Source
Simple question:
Is it racist to offer a course called "The Problem of Whiteness?"
Would it be racist if the course was called, "The Problem of Blackness?"
Would you take out a student loan so you could take this course?
No it is not racist because racism is institutionalized. Whiteness is an institutionalized problem and something that people of color should be made aware of (as though they already aren't)
Would it be racist if the course was called, "The Problem of Blackness?" Absolutely.
Would you take out a student loan so you could take this course? Absolutely.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: LOSTinAMERICA
We also have soma, too. What else is legal pot?
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
a reply to: Jamie1
You had an okay thread going try not to take it off course with your islamaphobia. Israeli Jews kill Muslims just the same and to a greater extent. An Israeli guy ran over a five year old Palestinian girl for the hell of it last year.
And "subset of white" nah.
Also not Muslims as much as Radical islamists and wahabis. I habe plenty of Muslim friends that could care less and arent at all racist.
originally posted by: criticalhit
Another one of these threads huh?
Hasn't anyone ever heard the expression "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction"
Society is funny because people really only see reactions that happen small and quickly in front of them, but society, culture, races any large social system will ripple for decades before the reaction becomes obvious.
Everything leading to WW3 is the Reaction to WW2, Israel, the rearming of Japan, the rise of China all of it...
Multiculturalism is the equal and opposite fascist answer to the Nazis, It's a blind ugly behemoth reaction and it's going to fail horribly because it's just as bad in it's own way. Telling people they can not have their own race, identity, religion, philosophy or they get a label is simply no different than what the Nazis did, it's just an ISM, and it get's ugly when people decide their ISM is the only ISM. People want to belong, the mind needs rituals and to make sense of behavior, the true minority in this world is the person who beyond youth truly thrives on things always being different, not knowing what to expect from others or in the course of the day. The reality is however Most people need the regularity, to be able to predict what happens next, take comfort in things being somewhat predictable and knowing how to speak and walk and talk and simply to NOT FEAR being isolated by being too different.
This course is literally the sort of thing that created the "self hating jew" except apply it to Caucasians, what is scary is what Caucasians will once again become when the survivors the ones who didn't buy into the self hatred emerge after the fact in this endless, stupid, pathetic cycle, what the Israelis are today is what Caucasians will actually be when the dust settles and that will be scary as hell.
This is a cycle and one that needs to be broken, the concept of a United States was a good one, a Union of States with their own rules and identities that agree to cooperate this is what the model of a global world should be acceptance of other states as friends without the need to Impose Global social rules or cultures. What we are doing including vis the UN is fighting each other for a "One world" philosophy and this will go round and round until we destroy each other. Nothing about multiculturalism respects culture, borders or Identity any more than the Nazis did.
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: ladyinwaitingETA: I truly am convinced there is no such thing as a "race bashing class" at any University in the U.S.
Seriously?
Try talking to some students who take the class and were offended by it.
Or try talking to college students at any major university.
Or try reading through the text books assigned by the professor for White Racism class.
By the way, you're link to "help me" understand what an "ethnic" university is didn't help much.
It's a university for "all ethnicities?"
What does that even mean? Why even designate it as an "ethnic" college then?
originally posted by: LOSTinAMERICA
originally posted by: GogoVicMorrow
a reply to: Jamie1
I was told to check my white privilege by a fellow white college student the other day. All I had done was explain the difference in the bundy ranch standoof and the new case of NBP open carrying patrolling neighborhoods. I even defended the NBPs rights as long as the particular individualshadnt been threatening or committed any crimes.
I also pointed out he was confusing the black panther party with new black panthers and the kid blew his stack and went on a tirade about me and my white privilege. Colleges are breeding aome crazy thinking.
I would have told him the real deal. They are teaching you that to be a victim. If you keep on about it, it will manifest into the hate you wanted. You're not going to like the end result. So, if you're all done with your pity party, wanna talk about something constructive or do you want to put me on the defensive some more. If you want to go with putting me on the defensive, I'll be sure to school you in reality.
It’s readily accepted that white history is taught, year-round, to the exclusion of minority histories. But the literal history of whiteness — how and when and why what it means to be white was formulated — is always neglected. The construction of the white identity is a brilliant piece of social engineering. Its origins and heritage should be examined in order to add a critical layer of complexity to a national conversation sorely lacking in nuance.