I am now questioning the characteristics of a truly 'Novelty' point or event...
it would seem to me that a 'Novelty' would be something which causes a new paradigm to blossom...
as opposed to an odd event (not a Novelty) which springs forth from a disintegrating paradigm.
I would suggest that the 911 event (if it was indeed a false flag) was a result of the Entropy of a disintegrating system and therefore Not a
...just as a future resource rationing of non-GMO foods, water, and complete dystopian control of all aspects of a police-state social order would Not
be 'Novelty' but an extreme form of decay...
I might suggest that 29 June 2014, some 75 days after the start of the present blood-moon Tetrad, would be a Novelty
As that date officially began the 'Caliphate' and the resulting 'Jihad' (existential war) against every ideology that is not specifically Radical
creation of the Caliphate allows the Muslims to wage war on the world instead of the pre-Caliphate condition which limited 'Jihad' to a
protective/defensive position against the forces that sought to contain or imperil Islam...
presence of a Caliphate (aka: Islamic State) then allows for the Jihadists to kill with abandon, commit atrocities for the reason of just
creating overwhelming fear and the resulting Chaos, to create the mindless confusion and terror which is supposed to create the world conditions which
demand the return of the Mahdi to establish a global rule of Islam
'Novelty' needs to be defined a lot better in my opinion
nuclear bomb development/testing led to Hiroshima
OKC & 911 were not Novelty events in my viewpoint, but rather the disintegration of the existing world order
thanks for hearing me out
edit on th30142901566514472015 by St Udio because: (no reason given)