posted on Jan, 21 2015 @ 06:13 AM
Many times "art" is considered something that is meant to evoke an emotional, social or political reaction. I haven't listened, but if they are
trying to be anti-art, that will be hard based on the former definition as they are trying to evoke a response from the listener.
Having studied the philosophy of art, my personal definition is that it should evoke an aesthetic response, that being a response to the beauty of an
art object, not any message that may be conveyed. Classic art portrays aesthetic beauty in it's realistic rendering and abstract art with pure form
and color. Anti-art, therefore, must be something that portrays some disturbing anti-aesthetic properties that evoke a negative emotional response.
Repulsive, angry responses evoked by a "work" may actually be considered a type of art unfortunately.