It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Possible Ebola patient in New Jersey

page: 1
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 02:48 PM
link   
I'm having trouble getting this to work, so I'll do this the old-fashioned way:

Excerpts:

"A woman who worked with Ebola patients in Sierra Leone was taken off a United Airlines flight by police in hazmat suits Monday afternoon and was being monitored for the deadly virus at a New Jersey hospital.

The Bergen Record reported that Port Authority police in hazmat suits boarded United Airlines Flight 45 at Newark Liberty International Airport shortly after it arrived from Brussels. The paper reported that the unidentified woman was removed to an ambulance waiting on the tarmac and taken to Hackensack University Medical Center.

Officials told the paper that the woman had exhibited a high fever and had vomited on the flight."



Meanwhile, further down in this report:




"A hospital official said the woman did not have a fever when she arrived at the facility. The hospital's chairman of emergency services, Dr. Joseph Feldman, released a statement saying the woman was being held overnight out of "an abundance of caution."

www.foxnews.com...

This woman arrived back yesterday. It seems to me that in most previous reports about "possible" Ebola patients, the press and local authorities were always quick to say things like "it's highly unlikely that this person will test positive" or if someone tested positive, that "it's highly unlikely that anyone else will catch it from them."

Also, in times past reports were quick to proclaim that said patients tested negative, even in record time.

Am I reading too much into this? Is it me, or is the lack of information confirmation that this patient tested positive? Is it confirmation that patients are still being disappeared?

I searched high and low for updated reports about this patient but couldn't find any.

Thoughts, anyone? Thanks!




posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 03:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: dianajune
I'm having trouble getting this to work, so I'll do this the old-fashioned way:

Excerpts:

"A woman who worked with Ebola patients in Sierra Leone was taken off a United Airlines flight by police in hazmat suits Monday afternoon and was being monitored for the deadly virus at a New Jersey hospital.

The Bergen Record reported that Port Authority police in hazmat suits boarded United Airlines Flight 45 at Newark Liberty International Airport shortly after it arrived from Brussels. The paper reported that the unidentified woman was removed to an ambulance waiting on the tarmac and taken to Hackensack University Medical Center.

Officials told the paper that the woman had exhibited a high fever and had vomited on the flight."



Meanwhile, further down in this report:




"A hospital official said the woman did not have a fever when she arrived at the facility. The hospital's chairman of emergency services, Dr. Joseph Feldman, released a statement saying the woman was being held overnight out of "an abundance of caution."

www.foxnews.com...

This woman arrived back yesterday. It seems to me that in most previous reports about "possible" Ebola patients, the press and local authorities were always quick to say things like "it's highly unlikely that this person will test positive" or if someone tested positive, that "it's highly unlikely that anyone else will catch it from them."

Also, in times past reports were quick to proclaim that said patients tested negative, even in record time.

Am I reading too much into this? Is it me, or is the lack of information confirmation that this patient tested positive? Is it confirmation that patients are still being disappeared?

I searched high and low for updated reports about this patient but couldn't find any.

Thoughts, anyone? Thanks!



The Ebola Czar has done a masterful job at covering up what is really going on. I find it hard to believe that there have been no new cases in the US.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 03:25 PM
link   
Sorry for the double post! I don't know how that happened.
edit on 20-1-2015 by dianajune because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 03:25 PM
link   
True......I also find it hard to believe there have been no new Ebola cases. Their silence re. this latest "possible" one is deafening.

I will keep hunting for updates and will post one if and when I find any.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: sirlancelot

Why?

Doctors across the nation were saying it would be hard for it to take foot hold in the states.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

Yeah, and Doctors from around the nation testified before congress that there was no evidence that smoking tobacco is bad for your health....fast forward some 35 years or more...I guess I don't see your logic.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

Is there a big ebola that is like big tobacco?

If you want to go the big pharm route then they would benefit blowing up the cases and then presenting a vaccine we all need to get and pay for.

If you can't see the logic I am using then you are just refusing to see it.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 04:56 PM
link   
a reply to: dianajune

It'll ramp up again now that the holidays are over.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: dianajune

It'll ramp up again now that the holidays are over.


The end is nigh.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: dianajune

It'll ramp up again now that the holidays are over.


That's what I was thinking. But for some reason they're awfully quiet about this patient. Maybe they disappeared her too.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: funkadeliaaaa
Yeah I hate it when we suspend doom porn for the holidays



a reply to: dianajune
Are they disappearing people? I'm behind....
edit on 1/20/2015 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 05:33 PM
link   
a reply to: ~Lucidity

No one is being disappeared, it is just conjecture of why cases of possible stop getting reported.

The logical conclusion is that the cases get confirmed as nothing and people don't like to report when they reported something that didn't need to be.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 05:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: sirlancelot

Why?

Doctors across the nation were saying it would be hard for it to take foot hold in the states.


Im not saying their is outbreak or anything but with a few hundred or people a day coming from one of the affected area's you have to think a few infected people get here and have it.

IMO the govt has more to gain by hiding it then full disclosure. You know how us Americans like to panic and all.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: dianajune

There were 10 in Michigan a few weeks ago being monitored for possible Ebola.


Your point with this one?



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 06:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ~Lucidity

No one is being disappeared, it is just conjecture of why cases of possible stop getting reported.

The logical conclusion is that the cases get confirmed as nothing and people don't like to report when they reported something that didn't need to be.


Its conjecture to assume it's not just because we dont hear about!



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 07:08 PM
link   
14 people actively monitored for Ebola in Mich. | WOODTV.com

woodtv.com...


There are so many more people suspected of or being monitored for Ebola…we have no idea.

14 people actively monitored for Ebola in Mich. | WOODTV.com
woodtv.com/2014/.../14-people-actively-monitored-for-ebola-in-mich/

"Dec 23, 2014 ... January 18, 2015 ... 14 people actively monitored for Ebola in Mich. ... monitored for the Ebola virus in Michigan, according to the Michigan ...(cont)..."



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 11:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: dianajune
I'm having trouble getting this to work, so I'll do this the old-fashioned way:

Excerpts:

"A woman who worked with Ebola patients in Sierra Leone was taken off a United Airlines flight by police in hazmat suits Monday afternoon and was being monitored for the deadly virus at a New Jersey hospital.

The Bergen Record reported that Port Authority police in hazmat suits boarded United Airlines Flight 45 at Newark Liberty International Airport shortly after it arrived from Brussels. The paper reported that the unidentified woman was removed to an ambulance waiting on the tarmac and taken to Hackensack University Medical Center.

Officials told the paper that the woman had exhibited a high fever and had vomited on the flight."


Meanwhile, further down in this report:


"A hospital official said the woman did not have a fever when she arrived at the facility. The hospital's chairman of emergency services, Dr. Joseph Feldman, released a statement saying the woman was being held overnight out of "an abundance of caution."

www.foxnews.com...

This woman arrived back yesterday. It seems to me that in most previous reports about "possible" Ebola patients, the press and local authorities were always quick to say things like "it's highly unlikely that this person will test positive" or if someone tested positive, that "it's highly unlikely that anyone else will catch it from them."

Also, in times past reports were quick to proclaim that said patients tested negative, even in record time.

Am I reading too much into this? Is it me, or is the lack of information confirmation that this patient tested positive? Is it confirmation that patients are still being disappeared?

I searched high and low for updated reports about this patient but couldn't find any.

Thoughts, anyone? Thanks!




Oh yeah! My dad's county. With his weakened immune system lately, I feel so much better knowing how good the Ebola Czar is at hiding crap like this. I have TONS of family in Bergen County and family that lives on the outskirts of Bergen but work in Bergen county. In fact my cousin is a vet tech at Bergen County Animal Shelter. During hurricane Sandy she was going back and forth through downed power lines to make sure the animals were fed and safe. After years and years of trying she just found out in November they're finally pregnant. Maybe I should warn her to stay away from Bergen County, but knowing her and her big heart she'd go anyway.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: BlueJacket

Is there a big ebola that is like big tobacco?

If you want to go the big pharm route then they would benefit blowing up the cases and then presenting a vaccine we all need to get and pay for.

If you can't see the logic I am using then you are just refusing to see it.



You mean like this vaccine?

Ebola Vaccine



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 11:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: funkadeliaaaa
Yeah I hate it when we suspend doom porn for the holidays



a reply to: dianajune
Are they disappearing people? I'm behind....



I doubt they are causing people to disappear, BUT, there have been stories of people going into the hospital for treatment, or quarantine, for example Nurse Pham's boyfriend in Dallas, he went into her Dallas hospital for quarantine, but never came out and no one heard from him ever again, could just be he, like others are limelight shy. Who's to say though. It does look suspect and makes people think they are being vanished when they don't make an appearance again.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 11:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Anyafaj

And keep the cases under wraps and docs telling people in the very unlikely event that you do get the virus that it can be treated here in the states drives people to get it how?



new topics

top topics



 
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join