It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So someone living on mars, or the moon, where the gravity is a lot less than on earth, would they also find that they would age less?.
originally posted by: angus1745
It might explain the effect that insects seem to be 'time shrunk' ie. for them time goes much slower in which they have ample time to react to and evade attempts to kill them.
Gravity is related to the size of the planet that it eminates from and for species native to that planet it is a constant. prolonged long term exposure to a different gravity might cause the body's physiology to compensate for the difference in overall muscle use and energy consumption by basically wearing out less quickly than a body in it's normal gravity would.
Similar to the insect time shrink phenomenon human beings might age significantly slower after generations of living on a much larger planet than earth but those on smaller than the earth planets would be effectively 'time shrunk' with no loss of life expectancy, they would be beings of great height and incredible speed and agility with insect like reactions and calculative abilities similar in speed to machines. however.
The ones on the larger planets would be able to not only outlive them but snap them like twigs.
So we have that to look forward to.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
There`s no such thing as gravity.
originally posted by: iDope
a reply to: anonentity
You make a great point. But one question I ask to everyone, why is it that during a "crisis" or "harmful" event, time seems to slow down, as if allowing your brain or conciousness to absorb all incoming data as imminent value as compared to jsut walking down the street?
Is there a relationship between Earth's rotation and its magnetic field? Yes, according to the Parker Dynamo Model developed in the 1960's. Magnetic fields are generated by circulating currents of charged particles in a medium that is electrically-conducting. The sun represents a rotating gaseous body of high-temperature plasma with one type of conductivity. The Earth rotates much faster, and the liquid iron-nickel in its core has another conductivity. Jupiter rotates even faster and has yet another type of conductive core region. Parker described how the fields are generated, and derived a simple formula that describes the strength of the field AND how rapidly the field would reverse its polarity. For the sun, with some reasonable estimates for its conductivity and rotation speed, you get a polarity reversal time of about 20-50 years. For the earth, this number is between 200,000 and 500,000 years. In each case, the reversal period estimate matches pretty nearly what is actually determined from the sun spot record and from studies of terrestrial paleomagnetism. There are, however, some detailed problems with Parker's model for solar activity, but it is still the simplest one we have to go with for purposes of classroom instruction.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
I Already explained Gravity is nonexistant.
Gravity is not what Tugs planets around in orbits.
Gravity is not what allows sub atomic particles to orbit
And force dosn`t magically apply itself simply based on *Existance*
This makes absolutely no sense. There is either local activity, Caused by magntism- Which Foundation of all Charged particles. Without Magnitism, Electricity would not exist.
It`s not really that hard to Understand. Even Dirt is magnetic, Every single thing on this planet can be magnetically charged.
Magnetic force exists. Gravity is a made up concept that borrows from magnetic force in order to seem like it exists.
The 2 are interchangable. Think about it. You can`t think of one instance where gravity is used yet magnetism is left out.
Is it just a coincidence that the planet resonates magnetic frequencies from it's core that even allow our atmosphere to even be possible? Probably not. And i can garentee you gravity has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Magnetic force is linar and demishes slowly until the feild is completely broken.
Where there is a strong magnetic force presence. *Gravity* will be there.
That is why voyager is caught inbetween Interstellar space and our heloshealth. Constantly bouncing in and out. That is how they were able to map the magnetic feild of our solar system.
Magnitism also has a rotational property.
How does magnetism counter Gravity? Is gravity * To weak* to counter charging alignment? You know that magnetic force is based on masses oritentation. What direction it is pointing and channeling energy. So the sun itself is spinning, And as the sun is spinning. Which maintains a constantly speed because the magnetic heartpeak is what is sustaining it's velocity.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Bedlam
Mass itself is oritented in magnetic forces, The known forces are Positive Negative and Neutral.
We catagorize these particles by their force, Meaning all positive acting particles are magnetic charged to positive and are called protons. And Negative are labeled electrons. Neutral are labeled neutrons. All of these particles attract and repell based on magnetic force.
Gravity is not what hold this mass together.
Gravity is theoretical particle falling the chasm of nothingness raining upon the surface of our planet drawn by our shiny particles.
But somehow, Exerts such a phenomenon as orbital procession.
Something seen on a molecular-atomic scale as the orbiting of sub-atomic particles. Following along a magnetic path caught in a spiraling motion to generate the image that is all the matter we see around us.