It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The "Phoenix Lights" craft was a TR6 TELOS?

page: 4
9
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 06:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Sport model?




posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 07:39 AM
link   
It still needs taxi and in fact I don't think there is an airport big enough for that size of aircraft.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 07:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Paperjacket
It still needs taxi and in fact I don't think there is an airport big enough for that size of aircraft.


If it has hover capability why would it need a runway?

More in need of a ginormous hangar.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 07:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: draknoir2

originally posted by: Paperjacket
It still needs taxi and in fact I don't think there is an airport big enough for that size of aircraft.


If it has hover capability why would it need a runway?

More in need of a ginormous hangar.


The reason I did not mention a hanger is because there is no such long-span building to my knowledge.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 08:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Paperjacket

originally posted by: draknoir2

originally posted by: Paperjacket
It still needs taxi and in fact I don't think there is an airport big enough for that size of aircraft.


If it has hover capability why would it need a runway?

More in need of a ginormous hangar.


The reason I did not mention a hanger is because there is no such long-span building to my knowledge.


Maybe it folds up.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 11:29 AM
link   
So what if its ours? The question is HOW did we acquire the technology that seems to be inconsistent with known physics.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: ATSZOMBIE
So what if its ours? The question is HOW did we acquire the technology that seems to be inconsistent with known physics.


Loaded question.

Assumption 1: The tech was "acquired".

Assumption 2: The tech is inconsistent with "known physics".



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 12:26 PM
link   
a reply to: draknoir2

Assumption 3: The tech involved doesn't just
project fake images or fake mental images.

Assumption 4: That there is tech involved
at all.

Assumption 5: That there is something
substantial there at all and that the entire
purpose of all this isn't a pure psychological operation.

Kev



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: ATSZOMBIE
So what if its ours? The question is HOW did we acquire the technology that seems to be inconsistent with known physics.


Dont you mean commonly known physics?

Im sure the TR3 series of craft are still secret for the simple fact that the propulsion system needs to be kept secret.
These craft have been around for decades. Isnt this an offshoot of the Aurora project?



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Thing looks so flimsy, I could break it with a captain kirk karate chop.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: draknoir2

Assumption 3: The tech involved doesn't just
project fake images or fake mental images.

Assumption 4: That there is tech involved
at all.

Assumption 5: That there is something
substantial there at all and that the entire
purpose of all this isn't a pure psychological operation.

Kev


Sorry, but none of those were implied in that question.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: draknoir2

Assumption 3: The tech involved doesn't just
project fake images or fake mental images.

Assumption 4: That there is tech involved
at all.

Assumption 5: That there is something
substantial there at all and that the entire
purpose of all this isn't a pure psychological operation.

Kev


Certainly a possibility, but I wouldnt count on it.
I think the physical tech has been used for psychological operations. Including "abductions".
You cant generally take pictures of a psychological transmission, but I wouldnt rule out a projection in many cases, just the ones that cause physical phenomenon, like radiation burns, or physical feelings.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue Shift

I believe you are right sir. MI6 notified the CIA to watch out because they intercepted via project Listening Rainbow that the Leprechauns have made a flying version of Stonehenge and are planning to meet up with the Menehune in Hawaii (Hawaiian version of leprechauns) and plan a revolt against the human use of their magic.

The Feds are massing in a raid to end the shenanigans they are planning but I don't have any details as the mission: Operation Angry Luau, is currently classified under it's OPSEC rules.

On another note. Didn't he who should not be named claim that they park these giant triangles in very high orbit facing down towards earth to minimize their exposure?


edit on 20-1-2015 by BASSPLYR because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 01:21 PM
link   
Just got a weird phone call from some guy claiming to be a Morlock.
He said he wanted his underground base(DUMB) back.

I dunno, *shrugs*

Oh yes, almost forgot, he was also asking who parked their bloody TR6 in his volcano.
edit on 20151America/Chicago01pm1pmTue, 20 Jan 2015 13:23:19 -06000115 by OneManArmy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: draknoir2

The thrust of this thread seems to be
that there is 'real' but 'reality' bending
US government hardware involved and
there is dead zero evidence this is true.

But if I took your response to be other
than it was --- sorry. These threads
turn into minefields...it's hard to
contribute to them after a certain
point due to 'social issues'.

Kev



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Hmmm, I've not seen any specific details or details that reach much beyond speculation.

However, there appears to be sufficient anecdotal evidence and leaks from former Skunk Works personel to make it seem entirely plausible the gov't scientists and Skunk Works technicians have reverse engineered technologies we know little or anything about.

Why would the DIA deny anything? To deny something lends it credibility when the denial comes from a Govt that has little, if any credibility remaining.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: TonyS

Years ago a group of SAP workers got together online, and hid a discusion of various programs. A number of them were nothing but speculation.

When the DIA found out they gutted the discussion, censured the venture group, which included one losing his clearance and several living under a microscope and undergoing multiple polygraphs.
edit on 1/20/2015 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 02:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: draknoir2

The thrust of this thread seems to be
that there is 'real' but 'reality' bending
US government hardware involved and
there is dead zero evidence this is true.

But if I took your response to be other
than it was --- sorry. These threads
turn into minefields...it's hard to
contribute to them after a certain
point due to 'social issues'.

Kev




The thrust of the TR3 is some unknown source.
The TR3 does indeed exist, there are just too many photographs and sightings.
So being as it exists, and it flys by some "silent", "anti gravity" type propulsion as described by all the witnesses, then the propulsion system must exist in the realms of reality.

Or this is a carefully contrived hoax with people from all over the world working together to make up lies.

They are both possible.

But which is "reality"?

Both, probably.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 02:18 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear




The thrust of this thread seems to be
that there is 'real' but 'reality' bending
US government hardware involved and
there is dead zero evidence this is true


Last time I checked, alot of there hardware was made and imported from China.



posted on Jan, 20 2015 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: OneManArmy

The thrust of the TR3 is some unknown source.
The TR3 does indeed exist, there are just too many photographs and sightings.


Does it actually say "TR3" on the fuselage, or is that just common knowledge to all the witnesses?


originally posted by: OneManArmy
So being as it exists, and it flys by some "silent", "anti gravity" type propulsion as described by all the witnesses, then the propulsion system must exist in the realms of reality.


So the anti-gravity propulsion system was identified by its characteristic lack of noise by the same witnesses who immediately ID'd it as a "TR3"? These average people are drawing from a vast wealth of unknown secret knowledge, it would seem.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join