It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Government Just Shutdown a Bigfoot Researcher.

page: 12
74
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 08:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: interupt42
Is there a filed missing report for him?

Quick google news search for "Bob Garrett" shows nothing?

Also going to the www.namus.gov... There was no record of him?



The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs) is a national centralized repository and resource center for missing persons and unidentified decedent records.


Might be time for the hoax bin?


I'm sorry, have we now discovered that this guy does not even exist?




posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: jaffo

originally posted by: interupt42
Is there a filed missing report for him?

Quick google news search for "Bob Garrett" shows nothing?

Also going to the www.namus.gov... There was no record of him?



The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs) is a national centralized repository and resource center for missing persons and unidentified decedent records.


Might be time for the hoax bin?


I'm sorry, have we now discovered that this guy does not even exist?


Not that I know of?



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: interupt42

originally posted by: jaffo

originally posted by: interupt42
Is there a filed missing report for him?

Quick google news search for "Bob Garrett" shows nothing?

Also going to the www.namus.gov... There was no record of him?



The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs) is a national centralized repository and resource center for missing persons and unidentified decedent records.


Might be time for the hoax bin?


I'm sorry, have we now discovered that this guy does not even exist?


Not that I know of?


Ok, ok, my misunderstanding there.



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 11:52 AM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

Investigation after what dig? There was no "investigative" dig. The snip you pasted says a large pit was dug out but had not been used. It means they found a pit which resembled an unused grave site.

Second, you're using a discrepancy between two sources regarding the settlement of Indians on Whidbey Island as some sort of debunk on what exactly? The website? Bigfoot? Anecdotes? I fail to see the implications you adamantly protest.

Third, you fail to address any other anecdotes because you barely even made it past the first page out of 50? Because of a historical discrepancy regarding native settlements. Bias much? 50 pages of information and you didn't even get to page 2. I commend you on your stellar ability to not even try. For the record, Whidbey Island was inhabited by the Snohomish and Skagit tribes up to the 18th century until they were decimated by disease brought on by white settlers. So technically, depending on the dates, there is some validity to the article.



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: FlySolo

sigh -- i shall repat the quote with bold // underline to enlighten you



After 1995: Whidbey Island, Washington. Rhett Mullis found large mounds on this island in Puget Sound where there is no history of Indian residence. A large pit had been dug out but had not yet been used. There was a “hallway” along a well-used trail and scat was scattered around. The mounds were covered with large hand-sized rocks. Plants had been pulled up and placed on top of the mounds in order to hide them. Possible Bigfoot graveyard. Reported by Rhett Mullis.


they claimed that mouunds were present - not just a pit

further the spurious claim of :


no HISTORY of indian residence


is meant to imply that no indians ever lived there - a blatant lie

lastly it implies the " mounds " are a product of alledged big foot

PS - and finally - do you know what scat is ???????????? i have to ask - as you dont seem to have realised what can be analysed from it


but not a single sample was taken

ETA :

and also IF the area was as heviliy trafficed as xlaimed : footprints


also - the aledged pit - HOW it was dug could be investigated - ie tool use etc etc etc
edit on 22-1-2015 by ignorant_ape because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 12:46 PM
link   
a reply to: FlySolo

i didnt bother with the others because the one that i did disect was so poor



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

What happens to the dirt when you dig a hole? it piles up. Hence, mound?? I think a skill testing question must be answered first from now on before responding to me.




PS - and finally - do you know what scat is ????????????


The one paragraph article isn't a peer review on the # found at a site. But somehow you feel it is prudent to point out there is no analysis mentioned.

That's as far as I'm willing to go debating a historical discrepancy to help you with your straw man argument. One little paragraph out of 10,000 words or more and you feel you've debunked an entire phenomenon and a million anecdotes.
Sorry, I'm much more complicated than that. If you choose not to read any more for fear of cognitive dissonance, that's your issue.



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: FlySolo

sigh if there was any analysis - it would be bu published - not just a spurious annecdote

as for the " mounds " if you are attempting top clsaim they are spoil heaps from the aledged pit - you are an idiot

read it again - the mounds were alledgedly camoflaged
edit on 22-1-2015 by ignorant_ape because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: FlySolo

i have a better counter challenge for you - from your multiple annecdotes - pick the one that has any evidence



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape

So you got a pit with a mound of dirt beside it covered with rocks and ripped out flowers. "Allegedly" camouflaged in your words. Grab a dictionary pal.


used to convey that something is claimed to be the case or have taken place, although there is no proof.



If you were any less of an idiot, you'd be a moron. While you're at it, why not grab some proven hoaxes and contribute them as well to your straw man argument. Don't respond, you'll hurt yourself with your clsaims (sic).



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: interupt42
Part of the answer to that is basically from within your own reply.

As one researcher said, absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence.


originally posted by: interupt42
He obviously has the know how to simply upload information to the internet and it doesn't take a seasoned out of the norm researcher to know what you stated above.

He has not released any factual evidence besides stories, how is this guy any different than other big foot hunters?

He had many videos which were uploaded to youtube, that is before his channel was taken down, and he was banned. So you are dead wrong about him just having "stories". Not to mention the other individuals in his crew with their testimony, corroborating his accounts.


originally posted by: interupt42
Why do this so called researchers never release the so called dangerous information and evidence till the MAN get to him.

Perhaps because "The MAN" has a global spying network in which all phones, tablets, and smart devices can record audio and video, something he was unaware of until it was too late.

edit on 22-1-2015 by Freezer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: FlySolo

saving the best for last - all this aledgedly occured on an island - which demolishes the wilderness // remoteness " get out "

so how many big foots can dance on a populous island - and still run a grave yard


hint - its a trick question



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 02:22 PM
link   
lets discet another " compelling " anecdote :


Date unknown, modern era: Pacific Northwest. A man witnessed three Bigfoots digging a hole with their hands to bury a fourth Bigfoot. Afterward, they rolled rocks on the grave. Reported by Roger Patterson.


and the reason that " researchers " havnt exhumed a bigfoot corpse is ????????????????????????????

this is the typical level of annecdote - utterly worthless



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 03:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
lets discet another " compelling " anecdote :


Date unknown, modern era: Pacific Northwest. A man witnessed three Bigfoots digging a hole with their hands to bury a fourth Bigfoot. Afterward, they rolled rocks on the grave. Reported by Roger Patterson.


and the reason that " researchers " havnt exhumed a bigfoot corpse is ????????????????????????????

this is the typical level of annecdote - utterly worthless


And they STILL insist that this guy's film is real, lol...



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 04:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Freezer

So he has nothing to provide for evidence?

Just because his youtube account was banned does that mean the originals are gone or their are no other methods or places to upload videos nor other methods of distribution?

Sorry , but until I see evidence he goes to the same bin as others -> entertainment if that.



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 07:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Freezer

So he has nothing to provide for evidence?

Just because his youtube account was banned does that mean the originals are gone or their are no other methods or places to upload videos nor other methods of distribution?

Sorry , but until I see evidence he goes to the same bin as others -> entertainment if that.

If you listen to the last interview I linked, he states his computer was hacked, and even describes the command prompt executing a script, and his videos were taken, although, if he didn't delete it off of his camera, they should still be there. He explains that his son and wife have been getting harassed, and that is the reason he will not share his work anymore, not because he can't upload to the web. Even if he does upload it again, whats to stop them from promptly deleting his videos and account? If they have him tapped, they will know the instant he logs on. Besides if your wife and son were getting harassed because of this, would you continue to push it? I know I wouldn't.



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 10:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: ReturnofTheSonOfNothing

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: ReturnofTheSonOfNothing

Did you read the others? Or did you only read and cherry pick what fits in with your belief system?

How about giving your thoughts on the others?

And also, he said himself in that link you quoted that all of those stories cannot be fabricated.

When you get literally hundreds of reports of the same thing, they all cannot be lies and hoaxes. Even the guy in that link knows that.
So see, you're only reading and hearing what you want to read and hear


and yes I am reading the others


Okay, I am looking forward to what you have to say about them, in detail.


The first part of my review of your links is up, here



posted on Jan, 22 2015 @ 10:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Freezer

I think its on debate what Garret is saying is truth or not, time will tell for sure. Now about Bigfoot killing humans or attacking them is rare (yes i believe there are bigfoot real flesh and blood) , most of the times Bigfoots will scare us off with grunts or throwing rocks, if we persist Bigfoots would then try more drastic measures.

Bigfoots are more related to ETs than gorillas or or other forms of simians or monkeys, thats why there are no sufficient evidence of them around, just some foot printings, some ocasional encounter but no bones no carcasses no death bigfoots and even if researchers try to get some of this evidence it will never happen, if bigfoot was related to gorilas or other some ancient ancestor of us I can tell you the scientific community would have already find bones and death ones with todays technology, but because they are more related to ETs that why there isnt much of real evidence like Et evidence.

Thats why there are many reports of Bigfoots and UFOs or strange lights at the same time in the same area because they are related.


Are Bigfoots more advance than humans??, the normal human (you and I an the rest of the forum) yes they are, Do they have more advance Tech ? yes they have but on the par with Gov Deep Black Ops that see's ET stuff has daily basis and sometimes there are confrontantions Opps...

Are we humans related to Bigfoots? some little part yes, Bigfoots are realeted to Mars, that what they would call "home", we humans have some stuff from Mars too but stuff from other stuff LOL so we are a bunch of walking stuff.

Hope this answer some stuff LOL about Bigfoot stuff



edit on 22-1-2015 by AlexDJ because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-1-2015 by AlexDJ because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: AlexDJ
a reply to: Freezer

I think its on debate what Garret is saying is truth or not, time will tell for sure. Now about Bigfoot killing humans or attacking them is rare (yes i believe there are bigfoot real flesh and blood) , most of the times Bigfoots will scare us off with grunts or throwing rocks, if we persist Bigfoots would then try more drastic measures.

Bigfoots are more related to ETs than gorillas or or other forms of simians or monkeys, thats why there are no sufficient evidence of them around, just some foot printings, some ocasional encounter but no bones no carcasses no death bigfoots and even if researchers try to get some of this evidence it will never happen, if bigfoot was related to gorilas or other some ancient ancestor of us I can tell you the scientific community would have already find bones and death ones with todays technology, but because they are more related to ETs that why there isnt much of real evidence like Et evidence.

Thats why there are many reports of Bigfoots and UFOs or strange lights at the same time in the same area because they are related.


Are Bigfoots more advance than humans??, the normal human (you and I an the rest of the forum) yes they are, Do they have more advance Tech ? yes they have but on the par with Gov Deep Black Ops that see's ET stuff has daily basis and sometimes there are confrontantions Opps...

Are we humans related to Bigfoots? some little part yes, Bigfoots are realeted to Mars, that what they would call "home", we humans have some stuff from Mars too but stuff from other stuff LOL so we are a bunch of walking stuff.

Hope this answer some stuff LOL about Bigfoot stuff




You can't be serious. You have to be putting us on, right?



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 09:12 AM
link   
a reply to: AlexDJ

citation required




top topics



 
74
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join