It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Answer
I'm 31, with no children, and I had a vasectomy performed in 2013 because I'm very sexually active with multiple partners and I do not want to end up with an unwanted child. If a significant other and I ever decide that we want a child, there are plenty of options for adoption or sperm banks.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: onequestion
I don't have any im consciously planning it out ahead of time so I can at least have certain things in order like a stable living enviornment and having what schools I want them to attend figured out ahead of time so they go to the same school their entire lives.
you know what that is a good plan but unfortunately there is this thing called life that somehow gets in the way of even the best laid plans....maybe one day when you get a bit older and wiser you will understand this
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: onequestion
I don't have any im consciously planning it out ahead of time so I can at least have certain things in order like a stable living enviornment and having what schools I want them to attend figured out ahead of time so they go to the same school their entire lives.
you know what that is a good plan but unfortunately there is this thing called life that somehow gets in the way of even the best laid plans....maybe one day when you get a bit older and wiser you will understand this
This is hilarious - does the mother get any say - when you've picked her out that is......
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Answer
I'm 31, with no children, and I had a vasectomy performed in 2013 because I'm very sexually active with multiple partners and I do not want to end up with an unwanted child. If a significant other and I ever decide that we want a child, there are plenty of options for adoption or sperm banks.
Can I just say thank you.
Honestly, so few men take responsibility.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Nyiah
So I get it.
Consciously creating children is a bad idea.
Thanks.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: onequestion
I don't have any im consciously planning it out ahead of time so I can at least have certain things in order like a stable living enviornment and having what schools I want them to attend figured out ahead of time so they go to the same school their entire lives.
you know what that is a good plan but unfortunately there is this thing called life that somehow gets in the way of even the best laid plans....maybe one day when you get a bit older and wiser you will understand this
This is hilarious - does the mother get any say - when you've picked her out that is......
i am not so sure that question should be directed my way......i found out the hard way it takes two to tango,my two kids are proof of this
originally posted by: FyreByrd
a reply to: onequestion
I agree in principal. In practice, however, I don't believe it is in anyone's interest to dictate how one should plan to raise a child.
Personally, I believe a child need a 100% at home parent for the first five years, and then a parent in the home for all time outside of school. But I can't dictate that to another.
I think getting rid of the 'child' deduction would go a long way to limiting family size and encouraging actual child rearing discussions. Empowering women's sovereigncy in their own bodies and life's would contribute to child well-being as well.
Population must be addressed in a rational, non-judgmental and secular manner.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Annee
Ok I get your limited viewpoint thanks.
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: FyreByrd
a reply to: onequestion
I agree in principal. In practice, however, I don't believe it is in anyone's interest to dictate how one should plan to raise a child.
Personally, I believe a child need a 100% at home parent for the first five years, and then a parent in the home for all time outside of school. But I can't dictate that to another.
I think getting rid of the 'child' deduction would go a long way to limiting family size and encouraging actual child rearing discussions. Empowering women's sovereigncy in their own bodies and life's would contribute to child well-being as well.
Population must be addressed in a rational, non-judgmental and secular manner.
Excellent ideas. I would also like to suggest that a tax break be given to people for not having children.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: LOSTinAMERICA
Smart people, please breed. I would like more of you in the world to offset the numbers of the low IQ types. Nothing against the low IQ type. I feel with smarter people being the majority, humanity will have a chance. The average IQ types will figure it out.
Too eugenic?
Yeah, because....Ted Bundy had a really high IQ Score, As did Jeffrey Dahmer...145 I think, John Wayne Gacey was above averge in IQ ...Some of the NAZI scientists experimenting on their prisoners were very, very smart...there are some really, really smart guys in ISIS as proven by their organization and military tactics. ...See, there's a problem with that line of thinking.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: amazing
It's all about having access to and using contraceptives. In this day and age they should be cheap and readily available to all.
I worry that contraceptives will lead to our extinction. Sooner or later our children will start being born sterile and all because we refuse to accept the real responsibilities and consequences of sex.
Its pathetic really.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: windword
No it's not unreasonable to expect people to make responsible choices.
originally posted by: Skid Mark
a reply to: LOSTinAMERICA
Have you seen Idiocracy ? The movie deals with intelligent people having less and less offspring, while the idiots reproduced at a high rate. Eventually, the world was over run by stupid people. It's a good movie. Check it out, if you haven't already. I think you'll like it.
originally posted by: jlafleur02
a reply to: onequestion
Maybe you should have lageslation sponsered to force plan pregnacy. How many births are planned anyways? do you know. How many kids do you have ?
originally posted by: bitsforbytes
Funny how, for example, the bible address' all the points you mention. That there are already plans to lead a healthy life.
Plan before making love, it is called marriage. Be honest with yourself so you may choose real love for life.
Hold family oriented values.
Work hard.
Eat what God has given us. That alone would solve soooooooooooo many problems, but nooooooooo God didn't make anything and GMOs are better. Fools.
Respect your parents and elders. Help others. Share. Test everything (education and learning). It is all there for people to apply.
Nothing new under the sun.
In a free society, you have to choose what is right amongst all the garbage and clearly a lot of people don't see right from wrong. I don't see anything new in your idea except you are implying to remove the freewill part.
originally posted by: LOSTinAMERICA
a reply to: Answer
We're holding out on a Cherry 2000 pleasure bot.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: karmicecstasy
I don't care if you think its impossible to plan pregnancies.
I'm not interested in that perspective I don't work with impossibilities if that offends you then oh well.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: corvuscorrax
But that's because they thought having a pleasureBle experience was important than being responsible.