It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
Firstly, pointing something out is neither being irate nor throwing a temper tantrum.
Secondly, if he used a different example, say gay men not protesting pedophiles enough, and a gay man pointed out how bigoted the example used was, would he get the same negative "STFU" response?
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: butcherguy
The OP doesn't shame gun owners at all. It is saying that asking gun owners to apologize every time there's a shooting spree is absurd and then it's asking why can't the absurdity be seen in asking Muslims to apologize for Islamic terrorism.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: butcherguy
So why are you arguing the gun angle? Surely you are aware that I've stood toe to toe with you against gun prohibitionists in support of the Second Amendment? So it's not like I'm against you on the gun issue. I'm just pointing out that this OP isn't about guns.
I can guarantee that probably 50% of the posters who reply to this OP will not read this disclaimer.
Disclaimer : This post is topical satire. Its aimed at trying to stimulate some deeper thinking on a particular subject. Its not meant as a slight against anyone personally. Its a parallel. I can guarantee that probably 50% of the posters who reply to this OP will not read this disclaimer.
originally posted by: butcherguy
Here is the part:
I can guarantee that probably 50% of the posters who reply to this OP will not read this disclaimer.
This was the plan from the start in my opinion.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: waynos
Obfuscating?
I posted how i felt about Muslims early in the thread, so everyone is not obfuscating.
That being the case, you'll understand the sensibilities of Muslim members reading anti-Islam hate posts after every atrocity.
I understood it well before this thread was started.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: butcherguy
Even if he did use gun owners for a reason, so what? He's still saying that it's absurd to blame gun owners for mass shootings, or to make them responsible for stopping mass shootings. How is that insulting gun owners?
I think the reason he made that statement about 50% is he knows how strongly people feel about their 2nd amendment rights. They feel so strongly that as soon as they see the title of the OP, they are going to start reacting - which they did. So what he said was simply a fact - not an insult.
originally posted by: neformore
Gun owners and advocates of the second amendment.
You believe in a right to bear arms - namely that individuals have the right to own a weapon if they wish to.
The constituton of the USA specifically covers such in the second amendment, and other countries round the world also have similar laws allowing the posession of weapons.
In the US, gun advocacy is rife with various pressure groups and organisations exist solely with the viewpoint of protecting the right to bear arms - the NRA comes to mind but there are, I believe, smaller groups.
The problem is that people with guns kill people. And the gun community isn't doing anything about it.
When was the last time you saw a mass rally by gun advocates such as the NRA protesting a spree killing?
When was the last time a gun owner apologised to you personally for the actions of others of their ilk?
Why haven't the majority of gun advocates stood up and done something about the spree killings, weeded out these extremist spree killers before they've struck and got rid of them?
When will gun owners reform their views that everyone has the right to bear a weapon, and change the writen advocacy of such, and their enshrined laws? They obviously don't care or they'd have done something about it by now. They probably secretly support the spree killings don't they?
Why aren't the gun community doing anything?
Disclaimer : This post is topical satire. Its aimed at trying to stimulate some deeper thinking on a particular subject. Its not meant as a slight against anyone personally. Its a parallel. I can guarantee that probably 50% of the posters who reply to this OP will not read this disclaimer.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Maverick7
I would say that a person from Britain where they have given up their rights to bear even pointed sticks has little business even starting a post about Right-to-Bear-Arms. The Second Amendment doesn't even apply to such persons.
Perhaps this person would be better off speaking to their own legislatures about creating a thug culture who can now prey on a disarmed populace?
Just posting a hypothetical. You know, just being tropically satirical.
Ding ding ding we have another one!
Maybe stop with the "dey took ourz Gunz derp derp derp" indignation and reread the op as it was nothing about gun control
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: butcherguy
Satire is used to shame a segment of the population.
The shame wasn't aimed at gun owners, it was aimed at Islamophobes. It used gun owners to paint the picture, quite well, I might add. Direct First and Second Amendment comparisons.
As a troll thread, this worked well to shame two different groups.
Islamophobes and those that support the 2nd Amendment. The satire was aimed at the Islamophobes.... The troll thread worked to shame gun owners. I guess you can't comprehend what I am saying. Maybe someday you will.