a reply to:
Chadwickus
A theory is just a theory.. I diddnt say it was a scientific theory and therefore it means something is unproven or speculative. And by saying that I
base it on supposition and ignorance, is in itself pretty ignorant.
Do you know me? Do you know what kind of research I have done in the past?
And sure, you have read the previous comments about the full metal jacket theory and yes they could have used that kind of ammunition but that dosent
contradict my remarks on the bloodless ground around the body. If anything it would guarantee 2 holes/shot in the body (entry hole + exit hole) and
that will lead to more blood. On top of that there is no guarantee that the FMJ goes through in a straight line, the bullet can actually end up
exiting sideways after hitting a bone and that would lead to a greater exit hole and damage = more blood loss "a full metal jacket bullet can be
compressed and can break when it turns side- ways along the track”
www.icrc.org...
www.uthr.org...
And thank you for the little walkthrough of bullet properties, but I already now the properties of both FMJ and hollow points, and their differences.
Finally, we dont know what kind of bullets the suspects used so its not worth discussing at this stage, but one thing that is sure is regardless of
the bullets used the wounds will leak blood, and based on the footage he is shot with at least 2 bullets. And over a time of approximately 23 seconds
we can’t see a single sign of blood on the ground. And I find that weird based on the enormous amounts of clips of real incidents regarding people
being shot. Some examples below
WARNING GRAPHIC footage -
www.liveleak.com...
WARNING GRAPHIC footage -
www.liveleak.com...
WARNING GRAPHIC footage -
www.liveleak.com...
"Deciding how people are acting differently to the way you think they should be acting in an emergency is not proof of anything besides the fact that
you've watched too many movies..same as the bullet. ”
Hah, here we go again with the personal insults whiteout knowing who you are talking to. Sure, I have watched a lot of blockbuster movies in my days,
but Im not using that material when Im analyzing these kind of situations. I rather use real footage I have seen regarding, people being shot, in
distress, panicked victims, terrorists, etc. And like I said, it seems a little weird that he turns his head, and it could explain the blank bullet or
it could be a reflex.
Well, its not flawed, if anything the things you say in your response is flawed.
"Your reasoning for the woman letting them in is flawed too, so she's crazy to bring her kid to a place that has been threatened before, yet you say
she must be in on it to let them in...so she brings her child anyway”
Yes, because if she was in on it, or more likely her only job was to let them in, she knew they wouldn’t hurt her and her child. Hard to
understand?
Here we go again.. Btw, thanks for all the laughs.
"You're also an expert on what terrorists do and don't wear, wearing a balaclava is now evidence that it was all fake now? ”
Did I establish my whole theory on just that remark? No I didn't. But its one thing that really don't make sense. And yes I find the balaclavas
weird,terrorists aren't usually afraid to show their faces especially when they are portrayed as martyrs and releases videos afterwards whiteout
anything covering their face. We where supposed to know who they where, and that contradicts the fact of them wearing balaclavas in the first
place.
www.vocativ.com...
And what are you trying to say with your remark on the female police officer?
Im not saying you are wrong, but I think they linked Amedy to that crime scene by DNA, not bullets.
"If it was all set up and Amedy didn't do it, then why not come out straight away and say it was him? That would further their supposed agenda of
fear, wouldn't it?”
Both yes and no. The aspect of not knowing who the gunman is at that time and the speculations that comes with it (is there more incidents like these
coming) Is also a great way to induce fear. And according to my theory, it is better to release that information when Amedy is in the supermarket,
because if it was released before people who knew him could have interfered with the planned operation.
"What sources said a gunman escaped? Can you post links please?"
www.dailymail.co.uk...
Your last words really gives warmth to my cold fictitious heart. Thank you!
But the bottom line is, you are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. And I think your whole comment and selectively chosen arguments
are pretty weak. I wrote a lot more, and some of the things you didn’t comment on are the key aspects of the theory.
My final guiding words to you would be:
You can keep yourself occupied with your search for the panther, or like you want it to be "tasmanian tiger” because like you said "some go as far
as to say there's a cover up by local government entities like the ranger, and parks and wildlife etc etc” and ill keep myself occupied with
searching for the truth in real events. And btw, don't get to influenced by the movie "The Hunter" from 2011 in your search for the answer.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Cheers!
edit on 12-1-2015 by Crowdpsychology because: (no reason given)