It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa
So the Air Force has been promoting UFOs for decades? With what? Project Bluebook? Project Sign? Project Grudge? How about the Condon Report, where half the scientists quit in protest when they were told the finding would be there are no UFOs? Denial after denial after denial.
But you would have us believe that when they say "no", they really mean "yes". Hope you never make that mistake on a date.
Up front the deny but behind the scenes they plant the seeds. The believers do the rest. Did you watch Mirage Men yet?
Why on earth do you think Blue Book would leave ANYTHING unidentified? If it was pure disinformation, by your logic, they would have said 100% of sightings were explainable. Your lack of knowledge on this is pathetic.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: noeltrotsky
Here is another good article:
Afraid for his life, Jacobs panics. To throw the wily hybrid off his trail, the good
researcher deliberately instills into the hypnotized Emma’s mind the information that
he is now an expert on this “public epidemic,” that she suffers from Multiple Personality
Disorder—not alien abductions—and she “needs to take medication for the disorder.”
www.ufoalienabductee.com...
(Note to Jacobs: Multiple psychiatric journals state that medication is not recommended
for someone with this disorder and that Multiple Personality Disorder, now known as Disassociative Identity
Disorder, is serious, chronic and the sufferer is at risk for suicidal attempts, self-injury,
violence, substance abuse, and repeated victimization by others. Good call, Doctor Practicing-Medicine-Without-a-License. Save your own skin and the patient bedamned.)
This is from Carol Rainey who was married to Budd Hopkins and was involved with a number of abduction cases.
She also makes a good point that you really don't need someone's ejaculate to test for DNA.
www.carolrainey.com...
An object that is even touched by one of these alleged creatures
could readily be analyzed with current DNA technology. The experiencer could discreetly
pick up a glass, a hair, a spoon, anything the being contacted and bag it, then contact
a lab or their local MUFON representative. If the claim of “hybrids among us” is indeed
“a falsifiable hypothesis,” as Jacobs often states, there must be a reason it remains
simply all hot air.
edit on 11-1-2015 by Scdfa because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa
UFO denier rule 1. Don't like the message? Ignore it, and attack the messenger.
Isn't that exactly what you are doing with your post?
Jacobs' work is extremely important and needs to be taken very seriously.
I completely, 100%, with every fiber in my being, completely disagree with you. I would say Stanton Friedman is way above Jacobs in all matters of importance and I don't like him very much either. Jacobs is a disaster.
Nope, asking for some supporting evidence/sources for what appears to be mere personal assertion based on belief is hardly adversarial. One should not make claims on an internet forum if unwilling to be questioned.
originally posted by: Scdfa
It's hard to take seriously people who take an adversarial position while demanding we take the time and energy to educate them
I asked for supporting evidence, not proof, there is a difference or perhaps you are unaware of that? As far as "petulantly demand" and "I'll never believe!" goes that is your invention alone.
or petulantly demand "irrefutable proof or I'll never believe!"
Yes of course, would that be because those who make bold factual assertions about aliens/UFO's do not have the confidence to share their own tenuous supporting 'evidence' when questioned?
A word to the wise, there is reason people keep telling you to do your own research.
UFO believer rule 1. Don't like the question? Make wild assertions, then refuse to provide any supportive evidence while stating "do your own research".
UFO denier rule 1. Don't like the message? Ignore it, and attack the messenger.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
My understanding is that hypnosis doesn't actually work for "recovering" memories, though it can be helpful for losing weight. What does happen is a false memory is formed with the aid of the person leading the session. Its called "confabulation" and Jacob's did not invent any "technique" to safeguard against this because you cant recover memories that you cant remember, you can only create new ones. And you don't even have to be under hypnosis.
originally posted by: mirageman I have always had a real problem believing in alien abduction stories.It's also something Americans seem prone to more than any other nation on earth for some reason. Perhaps there's a clue there?
any proof of that? I've read lots of reports from the UK as well as Canada myself.
Abductee's are about as secretive as people with top security clearances. You find that odd and evidence it's fake while I see as perfectly rationale because of the reaction they get whenever someone finds out about the experience. The vast majority know there is nothing they can do to stop it and don't want to know when it happens...thus not wanting to video tape the event. Further motion sensitive camera's and recording equipment aren't exactly in every home...and many are not familiar with setting up something like that. More evidence it's fake for you however because people don't react like you think they should. If you had talked to even ONE PERSON who claims abduction you wouldn't have wrote such a silly statement.
Well, you start by asking questions, then you....you know...investigate. There are people that are already investigating the few reports that are made. If you want to debunk it then you have to check how they investigate it
Absence of evidence is not evidence in of itself...but I'm sure you know that and just momentarily forgot.
originally posted by: noeltrotsky
a reply to: grainofsand
At least Zeta contributes to the thread topic by asking questions and posting information on his understanding. I don't agree but do appreciate his efforts and learned more about the Woods case which is nice.
You, grainofsand, simply sit back and post repetitively the same 'NO PROOF' while adding absolutely nothing to the topic. People who read the thread can easily see the Troll. They read posts, they pull up links and read more about subjects that interest them. When page after page you have provided nothing yet still demand proof on a topic it's glaringly obvious who the Troll is.
It's funny to run into the stubborn Troll that keeps at it no matter what. The longer it goes on the funnier they look!
So hypnosis only creates new memories, 'confabulation'? Well, I disagree completely. I've seen people remember better under hypnosis. It seems to especially help when the 'events' were surrounded by trauma, fear, or complete unknown. The subjects mind in those situations doesn't seem to form memories normally with the standard ability to remember. Before you quote studies on hypnosis understand that the extreme conditions I'm talking about are not part of the experiments.
Of course people can confabulate under hypnosis, but claiming everything remembered under hypnosis is fake, to be honest, shows you've never been involved in the process. Reading about something and doing it are very different. You should try the latter a bit more.
I was minding my own business in my backyard late at night when I felt the presence of something, like an animal crossing through the yard. So I get up to look around the yard and thats when a sudden change happened. I started receiving telepathic communications from Grey Aliens whom I could see were in my backyard, but they were covered by black shadows. There were some against the fence and some by the tree, and they were sending me mental images of what they looked like and they were just saying, "Hi we're here, there is 12 of us. We are 3 foot tall Grey Aliens with smooth skin." I would describe their skin color to look like moon-light, and that above message is all they said. I just stood there shocked. Having had ghostly encounters in my past, I knew for a fact this was not ghostly.
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: noeltrotsky
originally posted by: mirageman I have always had a real problem believing in alien abduction stories.It's also something Americans seem prone to more than any other nation on earth for some reason. Perhaps there's a clue there?
any proof of that? I've read lots of reports from the UK as well as Canada myself.
Well of course not. There's no proof of any alien abductions happening in reality.
So why has no one ever made an attempt to at least try to record this phenomenon taking place. Sounds to me like it's a poor method of investigation if you just let it go like that. Hey people accept it will just happen. But then if you believe something and you don't want to challenge your own belief then leave that vital piece of possible evidence alone.
So my conclusion has to be that we won't try and prove something at the risk it could be inadvertently de-bunked and destroy millions of people's belief systems.
Without any hard evidence, after nearly 70 years, it's somewhat difficult to conclude that aliens have been visiting us so frequently. The massive number of UFO and abduction reports only make it worse not better. Because there is nothing tangible to show from any of them.
originally posted by: mirageman
Why do you think they would be in your backyard saying that?
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
There is absolutely nothing to support that hypnosis helps recover memories. There is only evidence that hypnosis can create false memories. This has been known for some time now.
originally posted by: grainofsand
Oh dear, yet again cries of troll when I ask for supporting evidence when believers present assertions as fact.