It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I didn't accuse anyone of anything, but if you draw Venn diagrams of debunkers and disinfo agents, by definition, there is a large area of intersection.
Unfortunately, your use of a ad hominem attack on Dr. Jacobs proves nothing as it is a logical fallacy, he is not the only one to have studied this issue, and others have had similar findings.
originally posted by: Mehmet666Heineken
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: Mehmet666Heineken
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
Has it ever occurred to you that maybe people like him are employed by the government to foster ignorance?
So far I've not at all got that vibe from Paulides. Unless he hasn't made his strategic pivot yet and is still building up for that moment. As of now he's a total role model for active and retired law enforcement
Actually, Paulides has a shady past and apparently did not "retire" from law enforcement as he claims. Nor was he a police detective as he claims. He was a police liason officer until he got caught using official police stationary fraudulently. This raises questions about his credibility.
www.sjretirement.com...
afutureghost.blogspot.com...
Ok I'll read those but if he is a piece of crap that doesn't mean I also shoot his message down. Right now I think the main thing is to see if there are inconsistencies within his stories because so far I have found a few in terms of slight exaggeration which might prove enough to screw over his theories and accounts.
Okay, I get it no need to repeat it for the hundredth time, hypnosis is not allowed in court. It is also used by thousands of psychiatric and psychological professionals around the world.
ANYWAY Dr Jacobs also stated not all memories from his subjects were retrieved using hypnosis, some memories were just plain remembered and not hidden.
If Dr. Jacobs has no credibility, how did he keep his position at a well-known university?
One or two subjects out of hundreds complain about Dr. Jacobs, how is that different from any other professional?
How do we know Emma Stone did not set him up?
Concerns of the American Medical Association (Summarized):
The American Medical Association (AMA) has brought to the attention of both the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis (ASCH) and the Society of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (SCEH) that many individuals using hypnosis, some of whom may be members of one or both Societies, may be making the inaccurate statement that hypnosis is approved by the AMA as a legitimate therapy for medical or psychological purposes. The Societies have been advised by the AMA that this statement is inaccurate, and refers to a 1958 Council on Mental Health report that was rescinded by the AMA in 1987. If any members of the Societies are utilizing the name or initials of the AMA, they are requested to remove the name or initials of the AMA from those products, services, and/or promotional materials. The AMA objects to the use of its name in connection with hypnosis as it could imply the AMA's endorsement of those specific products and/or services and could violate the rights of the AMA including significant infringement of its trademark.
www.asch.net...
originally posted by: Raufu
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
HI I have considered hypnosis and there seem to be different methods, but I'm not compatible with deep relaxation excercises (I don't know how exactly to explain it, I can stay awake right until the point where I fall asleep but there's not much in between, like a trance state, and I'm far too self-aware of my body in such a state)
But that means, and I was told so, that we had to work with my "awake-state" clear memories. Again, the psycho docs are all about solutions and not very interested in recovering picturesque descriptions just because they find them curious, at least I haven't found that type of psychologist yet.
I don't think that that memories that have been "recovered" under hypnosis are false entirely, but recovered memory therapy could be causing false memories and even false memory syndrome (reading about it right now). Seems to be a controversial topic though. FMS is not recognized as a mental illness either.
However I did discover all memories on my own, not one single memory came up when a the therapist was present.
Still doesn't explain scars, wounds and weird things like neatly folded blankets and other things that I'd rather not talk about because it's impossible without going into details.
I'd like to ask you why there is such a strong, overwhelming rejection of the idea that this phenomenon could be more than meets the eye. Sometimes the efforts to reduce the universe to exactly what humans can perceive, are baffling to me.
The problem is that analytical science is per definition the art of picking things apart, reducing them to components and then look at those components. You can only pick apart what you can perceive. If there is phenomenon that's caused by an external source that we cannot perceive directly, all efforts to "analyze" it will ultimately fail because the root cause itself is not perceivable. It's like staring at a distorted shadow on the wall and trying to figure out how the real object looks like - impossible, since you cannot extrapolate the 3D dimensions of an object solely by it's 2D shadow. At the same time some cave men (referring to Plato's allegory of the cave) would argue until their dying day that there is no real 3D object (they can only perceive the shadow), hence the shadow cannot possibly exist, even if they're looking right at it, and has to be an illusion or hallucination.
Just another example of an abductee reluctant to discuss the experiences, while debunkers claim abductees are clamouring for fame and notoriety - the opposite seems to be true, and anonymously posting on the internet can hardly be counted as going public.
Just another example of an abductee reluctant to discuss the experiences, while debunkers claim abductees are clamouring for fame and notoriety - the opposite seems to be true, and anonymously posting on the internet can hardly be counted as going public.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
Hypnosis is certainly used for helping people lose weight, stop smoking and a number of other maladies where "suggestion" is used to strengthen will power and that sort of thing. Sports psychologists use it for improving performance. As a memory retrieval tool, it is utterly useless. That is pretty well established now.
(from previous poster not the one I'm responding to) ANYWAY Dr Jacobs also stated not all memories from his subjects were retrieved using hypnosis, some memories were just plain remembered and not hidden.
Again, you don't have to be under hypnosis to have someone lead you into a false memory. it really comes down to how suggestible someone is. Also false memories can happen all on their own.
Further, we really have no clue about any of Jacob's subjects except for what he tells us.
I am sure he was qualified to teach history.
(quoting someone else, not the person I'm responding to) One or two subjects out of hundreds complain about Dr. Jacobs, how is that different from any other professional?
You also know that Jacobs threatened Emma, right? His defense is that she is crazy! He tried to suggest that she had Multiple Personality Disorder while she was under hypnosis in order to throw the hybrids of HIS trail because they were sending him text messages! HOW DO YOU DEFEND THIS?
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
My contention is with people like Jacobs and Hopkins and their methodologies. I would even say that I am not willing to dismiss the works of Dr. John Mack entirely. I am not even ruling out aliens but I don't think "aliens" should be defining the phenomenon either.
www.carolrainey.com... In later sessions, Jacobs, hyperventilating, can be heard telling Emma that he’s in terrible trouble—that an outraged hybrid (who knows that Jacobs is the only person on the planet, other than Hopkins, who knows the evil fate that aliens are planning for human-ity)—that this hybrid is sending him threatening Instant Messages on his AOL account to make him cease and desist his work with the abductee Emma Woods. Jacobs is “the man who knows too much.” Personal IMs from a bloodthirsty hybrid who is entirely theoretical. It doesn’t get more hallucinatory than that.
Afraid for his life, Jacobs panics. To throw the wily hybrid off his trail, the good researcher liberately instills into the hypnotized Emma’s mind the information that he is now an expert on this “public epidemic,” that she suffers from Multiple Personality Disorder—not alien abductions—and she “needs to take medication for the disorder.” www.ufoalienabductee.com... (Note to Jacobs: Multiple psychiatric journals state that medication is not recommended for someone with this disorder and that Multiple Personality Disorder, now known as Disassociative Identity Disorder, is serious, chronic and the sufferer is at risk for suicidal attempts, self-injury, violence, substance abuse, and repeated victimization by others. Good call, DoctorPracticing-Medicine-Without-a-License.Save your own skin and the patient be damned.)
ufotrail.blogspot.com... “What I'm getting at,” I explained, “again, is the possible opportunities to do some testing. It would seem like she would prioritize such a thing if she knew a hybrid... Am I correct that you understood hybrids to have sent you text messages and emails?”
“Yes, yes,” Jacobs said, “and that I will be writing a book about. Within context, you'll see the build up to it and how it's all logical; how this came about. Now, I can't tell whether it's a hoax or not. The only way whether I can tell if it's a hoax is by looking in this person's window while typing, instant messaging, and she lives 125 miles away from me – and I'd have to be typing the whole way and then looking in her window to see whether she's sitting there or some guy's sitting there, ya know what I mean?
Hypnotic suggestions of Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)
Many people now know that while Dr. Jacobs was conducting hypnosis with me, that he implanted hypnotic suggestions in my mind that I had Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), a serious mental disorder, and that I should take medication for it. He did this even though he is not a medical doctor, and he knew that I did not have it.
Dr. Jacobs has admitted publicly that he did this, during an interview on the Coast to Coast AM radio show, “ET Hybrids / Ultraterrestrials”, on December 19, 2010. He has tried to justify it as a convoluted and outlandish “tactic” against “aliens” and alien-human “hybrids”.
I have presented here an audio clip of Dr. Jacobs putting the hypnotic suggestions in my mind that I had MPD.
(NOTE: This audio clip is taken from the recording of my twenty-ninth hypnosis session. Dr. Jacobs has a copy of the full recording.)
To be fair, we have no clue about anybody beyond what a book or movie or video tells us. How is that different for Jacobs' people than anybody else? And given the virulent evangelistical zeal that scoffers have in this topic, I can't imagine any subject wanting to be too public.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
I want to add that I fully support people that share their experiences. In fact, I consider myself an advocate for these folks. Emma Woods is a good example of someone that has had experiences that really cant be explained by "mental illness" or "sleep paralysis". I think that there may be more here than "psychological" explanations and saying so probably puts me in a different grouping than "debunker", wouldn't you agree? My contention is with people like Jacobs and Hopkins and their methodologies. I would even say that I am not willing to dismiss the works of Dr. John Mack entirely. I am not even ruling out aliens but I don't think "aliens" should be defining the phenomenon either.
Really, what would you recommend? Let us hear it!
Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum's (1992) assertion that 3.7 million Americans are suffering from "UFO abduction syndrome" has been criticized for methodological and logical deficiencies (Stires, 1993; Klass, 1993; Hall, Rodeghier & Johnson, 1993; Dawes and Mulford, 1993). In an attempt to remedy these deficiencies, my research methods class at Rutgers University in Camden undertook to replicate Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum's survey.
-----------------------
The survey data promise some relief from this subjectivity, thanks to the objectivity of random sampling and statistical analysis. However, even when the data are collected and reported accurately as they apparently were in this case, the biases of the investigator can enter into the interpretation. In this case, only a strong belief in the prevalence of the abduction phenomenon led the researchers to interpret questions about seeing ghosts or having "out of body" experiences as indicators of abduction. Our data show that there is no objective basis for that assumption.
The observed correlations are part of a broader psychological syndrome which includes non-UFO related phenomena. Of course, none of this proves that UFO abductions have not occurred in a small number of cases. In fact, two of our respondents volunteered that they had experienced such events. (We made no attempt to verify their accounts.) However, the public can rest assured that there is no evidence that millions of Americans are being abducted.
Further research on the psychological phenomenon of cryptomnesia, however, is warranted. Both our survey and Hopkins, Jacobs and Westrum's representative national sample suggest that it is an identifiable syndrome affecting several million people in American society.
I wonder if we might start a discussion about liminality
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Tangerine
I kind of got "schooled" by jeff a few years ago. Funny thing was that I had just binged listened to his podcasts about Emma Woods and had no idea who I was talking to. www.abovetopsecret.com...
I wonder if we might start a discussion about liminality
Yeah, sure. I don't know what I can offer but I think I am kind of done here. Maybe we can bump up the project core thread and get a fresh discussion going and I can take a break from my disinfo job.
originally posted by: Raufu
It's not the "lack of evidence" that prevents them from taking up the subject. A species that does nothing of any relevance and instead focuses on killing and torturing each other enforcing political / economical systems that are based on resource scarcity and exploitation can't possibly be interested in revealing the truth behind it all.