It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: deloprator20000
a reply to: Scdfa
I would say that the secret government is working hard to harass and intimidate anyone who even dares to question the status quo with regard to ETs.
originally posted by: Scdfa
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: funbox
a reply to: Tangerine
same question to you too , show me the tools tangerine
funbox
I'm not the one claiming that extraterrestrials visit earth and abduct people. If one wishes to claim that is fact, one looks to science and the scientific method. Fact is the purview of science. If one prefers to call it belief, then one looks to philosophy or religion or metaphysics. I have no problem discussing the topic in any of those contexts. But the context is determined by the person positing the context. In my experience, it's a rare UFO/ET enthusiast who is willing or able to distinguish between belief and fact. They approach the subject like religious fundamentalists who expect everyone to accept their personal beliefs as fact. Not going to happen on my watch.
Science has failed you. Your faith is endearing, but unfounded.
Science hasn't touched the issue for fear of losing funding, academic status, grant money, and losing their government contracts. Is that not the case? Science has given you seventy years of not investigating.
If you're waiting for science to inform you about the reality of UFOs, you will wait a long, long time. Oh, wait, you already have!
You should be nicer to us, pardner. We're all you got.
originally posted by: Scdfa
originally posted by: deloprator20000
a reply to: Scdfa
I would say that the secret government is working hard to harass and intimidate anyone who even dares to question the status quo with regard to ETs.
Thank you for your post. star.
originally posted by: deloprator20000
a reply to: Blue Shift
The problem is what type of evidence, if it does exist, would you accept? You see the problem, most skeptics say they want to personally meet an alien and see the craft and possibility ride in the craft. Yet, this is nearly impossible, so we have to consider the best indirect evidence.
The abduction phenomena is testable, most abductees report that they are abducted repeatedly. Hence, if you monitor a sufficiently large number of well-vetted potential abductees, then eventually you will be able to detect when and where they are abducted. With sufficient well-calibrated and well-functioning equipment monitoring the abductees eventually one day you will get some good repeatable data of possible ET abductions.
The basis of science is both analytical and synthetic, with priority given to well designed and interpreted empirical data.
originally posted by: deloprator20000
a reply to: Scdfa
I would say that the secret government is working hard to harass and intimidate anyone who even dares to question the status quo with regard to ETs.
originally posted by: Scdfa
I never said any such thing, and for the life of me I can't understand what you are trying to say about Project Bluebook. Do you? What is it about Bluebook that "suspicious"' and what does that suspicion point to in your opinion? You insult my intelligence, but you can't even communicate your point effectively. Pathetic, you say?
originally posted by: noeltrotsky
Too bad nobody seems to have read the Mufon study link I posted. Interesting stuff in there, for example...
'* 88% stated that their abduction memories were consciously recalled; 56% through dreams; 36% through hypnosis; 16% through other means such as flashbacks."
This shows that the bulk of memories are NOT obtained through hypnosis, thus reducing the problems that form of evidence causes for the Abduction research field.
The study link again is...
www.kathleen-marden.com...
(These questions were not on the NAE questionnaire.)
originally posted by: deloprator20000
a reply to: Blue Shift
The problem is what type of evidence, if it does exist, would you accept? You see the problem, most skeptics say they want to personally meet an alien and see the craft and possibility ride in the craft. Yet, this is nearly impossible, so we have to consider the best indirect evidence.
The abduction phenomena is testable, most abductees report that they are abducted repeatedly. Hence, if you monitor a sufficiently large number of well-vetted potential abductees, then eventually you will be able to detect when and where they are abducted. With sufficient well-calibrated and well-functioning equipment monitoring the abductees eventually one day you will get some good repeatable data of possible ET abductions.
The basis of science is both analytical and synthetic, with priority given to well designed and interpreted empirical data.
originally posted by: deloprator20000
a reply to: Blue Shift
The abduction phenomena is testable, most abductees report that they are abducted repeatedly. Hence, if you monitor a sufficiently large number of well-vetted potential abductees, then eventually you will be able to detect when and where they are abducted. With sufficient well-calibrated and well-functioning equipment monitoring the abductees eventually one day you will get some good repeatable data of possible ET abductions.
The basis of science is both analytical and synthetic, with priority given to well designed and interpreted empirical data.
Perhaps stunning genetic evidence confirming aliens have adulterated human heredity will be forthcoming soon. Dr. David Jacobs revealed in an interview with Jack Brewer (The UFO Trail ufotrail.blogspot.com...) he has collected and analyzed samples for such purposes. Given the potential extreme significance of such work and the premium placed on priority in awarding credit for new scientific discoveries, he should be anxious to publish detailed descriptions of each effort undertaken to acquire genetic samples, the specific analytic methods he employed and a complete accounting of all results and data. The information should also include full explanations of chain-of-custody procedures and sample integrity safeguards, quality assessments, all process controls and the precise standards employed for sample inclusion/rejection. Complete procedural details are critical because they will enable reviewers to determine which, if any, conclusions are rigorously grounded, must be considered tentative or challenged as invalid. If alien or hybrid DNA cannot be revealed despite repeated attempts, carefully documented and controlled experiments will enable scientists to confidently decide whether his ideas are or are not supported by genetic evidence.
For Dr. Jacobs, time may be running short. Clearly, since one investigator has claimed she knows some human-alien hybrids personally, he is not the sole investigator with access to potentially critical corroborating genetic samples. In addition, he is not necessarily restricted to collecting the retinue following inconveniently timed alien-perpetrated sexual assaults. He has also described subjects reporting events interpreted as evidence of missing pregnancies that were both initiated and terminated by alien intervention. While human-alien hybrid progeny are said to be spirited away, these missing pregnancy victims are known to him. Because cells from the developing baby may remain alive in the mother for decades (M. Barinaga, “Cells Exchanged During Pregnancy Live On,’ Science, 21 June 2002 [296:2169-2172]), these persons represent readily localizable subjects potentially harboring the direct genetic evidence of the nefarious alien manipulation of human genetics. But again, Dr. Jacobs faces potential competition when it comes to securing the first genetic proof of alien-induced missing pregnancies. The investigator/subject reporting she was used by aliens as a ‘breeder’ (Future Theater, 18 May 2013, www.futuretheater.com...) would both be rather easy to find and literally full of it.
Yes, and yes.
Does that prove I was abducted by aliens?
2. does this thread and its content of people need first hand experience of the abduction phenomena yes/no