It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You are just spouting an opinion, your right of course, with zero evidence to back it up.
I don't accept that a researcher in a field of study can be classified as biased simply because he focuses on one subject
Jacobs actually points out many things he's heard over and over from hypnosis that are NOT well versed in popular culture
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
my only contention with the abduction phenomenon is that people like Jacobs want to make it into something its not. People have anomalous experiences. I have had them. There are a wide range of experiences that get ignored or even molded into "abductions". Its actually a very narrow viewpoint. What about John Macks work or the alien like beings seen while in altered states? All dismissed because Jacobs can't fit that into his view.
originally posted by: Ridhya
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
That's right, everyone who doesn't blindly believe in aliens is a holocaust-denying pedophilia whitewasher.
Equally, it does not confirm the assertions either. If folk here state "I believe because..." instead of "It is a factual reality because..." then I would have no issue. It is just the claims of fact based solely on Jacobs questionable methods which shall of course attract questions from those who doubt the validity of his work.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
You have addressed the hypnosis issue, which I think is valid somewhat, but as I said this method has widespread use around the world so it certainly on its own does not negate the assertions in the OP.
Should we have ignored the Holocaust? Should we ignore child abuse and molestation? For you and I this is a rhetorical question, for others I'm not sure.....they would love to shut us up on this topic. Some only seem to like freedom of speech when it agrees with them.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Ridhya
Believer: "Alien abductions are a factual reality
Skeptic: "So may I ask what evidence you have?"
Believer: "The acclaimed work of Dr Jacobs"
Skeptic: "But a simple Google search will produce Psychology academics who discredit his methods and conclusions"
Believer: "They are wrong"
Skeptic: "How did you reach that conclusion?"
Believer: "Because Dr Jacobs said so"
Me: "Ah, that's nice, but I remain unconvinced"
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Ridhya
Believer: "Alien abductions are a factual reality
Skeptic: "So may I ask what evidence you have?"
Believer: "The acclaimed work of Dr Jacobs"
Skeptic: "But a simple Google search will produce Psychology academics who discredit his methods and conclusions"
Believer: "They are wrong"
Skeptic: "How did you reach that conclusion?"
Believer: "Because Dr Jacobs said so"
Me: "Ah, that's nice, but I remain unconvinced"
originally posted by: grainofsand
Equally, it does not confirm the assertions either. If folk here state "I believe because..." instead of "It is a factual reality because..." then I would have no issue. It is just the claims of fact based solely on Jacobs questionable methods which shall of course attract questions from those who doubt the validity of his work.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
You have addressed the hypnosis issue, which I think is valid somewhat, but as I said this method has widespread use around the world so it certainly on its own does not negate the assertions in the OP.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE
OK, so you believe in Jacobs work, I don't.
One thing is for certain though, Jacobs work does not confirm that alien abductions actually happen, and as long as that is the only evidence you can bring to the table I and many others will remain unconvinced.
Absolutely. I wholeheartedly support further research on the subject because right now the evidence supporting such claims is sorely lacking. Even in this thread the only case presented is the work of Dr Jacobs, and it is clearly not confirmation that alien abductions are a factual reality, so of course I support further research.
originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
Doesn't something that has tremendous ramifications for the human race, even if it has a 0.01% chance of being true, merit investigation?
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: noeltrotsky
No I asked if it was not odd that someone thought they heard aliens in their mind. Aliens who described themselves with smooth skin as "grey aliens" standing in someone's backyard. Intergalactic speed dating hey?
Now that might seem quite normal to someone who is convinced aliens exist, who abduct people and is desperately trying to prove it.
But there could well be another explanation for all of this couldn't there?
Nope. The only explanation that makes sense is that people are telling the truth.
originally posted by: Ridhya
a reply to: Scdfa
You accused Zeta of ad hominems and ignoring messages, when YOU did both those things to me. You keep calling everyone else closed-minded while denying the alternative theories. You keep ignoring the fact that mainstream news channels aired all the footage and even had alien specials on CNN and Fox. Every bloody cartoon had aliens in it. Movies, books, the media pushes belief in aliens. You're a believer, accept it.
There was never any doubt that Blue Book was a cover campaign, the CIA freaking admitted it. Back before everyone believed that experimental craft were flown by aliens, people suspected Soviets. Then suddenly comes out this promotion that they are extraterrestrial.
Your lack of knowledge on this is pathetic. You believe that saying 98% of cases were explainable would dissuade people? What a joke. So why on earth didnt they say 100%? They clearly left room for speculation. Yet you dont find that suspicious.