posted on Jan, 9 2015 @ 04:02 PM
I think this is a time that political correctness should be thrown out completely, and the idea of religious freedom should be separated from criminal
action, and the encouragement of criminal action. I think one of the greatest insults is that foreigners literally invade another country and then
attempt to install their own rules, which is totally unacceptable. If they do not like the way things are in that country then why did they go there
in the first place? The truth is that they leave their home countries because they are hell-holes, and instead of being grateful that a modern nation
allows them to enter, they do crap like this. I say that all of these people are criminals and should be deported or jailed for one thing or another.
Inciting a riot at the very least, and you could even take it to the charge of treason. If they are actively inciting an overthrow of the government
or any functions thereof, they are not just common criminals, but what would amount to rebels against the government. It does not matter which nation
something like this occurred within, as any sovereign nation's government should treat such individuals as criminals.
I am quite certain that these people will play the race card, saying how they are persecuted Muslims, but this should be viewed as a ploy, whether
these people believe what they say or not. If they believe that they are being persecuted because they're muslims, obviously they're ignoring the
fact that they are allowed to enter the country. If the state did not want them there, they would not have been allowed to enter in the first place.
And if they think they are persecuted, why don't they leave? There is no reasoning with fanatics, and these people are definitely fanatics. They want
to take advantage of the freedoms offered them in western nations, but then they turn around and bite the hand that feeds them. I have no sympathy for
such individuals, because they are in the wrong. And not only that, but they do not wish to coexist with the native inhabitants, rather they wish to
impose their own form of law, claiming religious freedom.
These extremely ignorant people do not realize that freedom of religion does not trump the laws of state. In most developed nations you are free to
practice your own religion, but only within the bounds of the law. And quite frankly, any religion that would break the laws of a nation must not have
a very peaceful doctrine, considering that the majority of laws are in place to punish crimes. Religion and crime? Doesn't make a lot of sense. This
is a problem that will continue to grow. What all nations need to start doing is realizing that the problem will only get worse, and because of this
these nations need to completely disregard being "politically correct," and need to treat these people as criminals. If this is not done, the
criminals will continue to push and push until they get what they want. People need to realize that Islam is NOT a peaceful religion.
People will say that there are peaceful muslims, and while this is true, they are the muslims who are completely going against the doctrine of Islam.
The doctrine itself calls for waging war against non-believers, plain and simple. Does anyone honestly think that all of the atrocities committed in
the name of Islam could be justified within the religion if the religion itself did not teach as much? I've outlined in the past just why Islam is a
religion of violence, and I will not reiterate those points here, but suffice it to say that there are numerous examples of calling believers to
violence. In one post I even outlined how this is different from other religious texts, such as the Bible, because there are always those who will try
to compare it to the Quran. The truth is that the violence of the Bible is in the Old Testament, which is Jewish law, and has little or nothing to do
with Christianity, since Christians believe that Jesus did away with all the old Jewish teachings and replaced them with being love and forgiveness.
Those atrocities committed in the name of Christianity were not justified by the religious doctrine, thus those errors were errors of people, not
doctrine. And the Bible does not call all believers to violence the way Islam does, rather the majority of the violence in the Bible are meant as
historical accounts. So why should any nation protect a religion when that religion calls for making all non-muslims subservient to believers? Make
all followers of Islam leave western nations, because Islam is NOT protected under religious freedoms, because it is more of a terrorist doctrine than
If I went and started a religion that taught the killing of non-believers, this group would be viewed as a terrorist organization as opposed to a
religion. Heck, we call groups "cults" when they are doing nothing more than having multiple wives, sexual promiscuity, etc...They are not even
calling for murdering people, yet look at how they've been treated. Yet nations will tolerate a "religion" that quite openly advertises what its
sadistic goals are? I don't think this is smart.