It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: TheArrow
He basically made the point that everything should be questioned. That's hardly nothing.
Actually, his response is nothing.
Lumping a bunch of other incidents with some vague supposition isn't anything.
Well tell me, what have YOU contributed to this discussion?
originally posted by: EternalSolace
It likely wasn't faked. Doesn't negate the necessity of this discussion or questioning motives. Another cliche quote, "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: TheArrow
The past helps to dictate the future. Governments lie, plot, and steal. We take past incidents, learn from them, and apply them. The incidents that were mentioned, on their own, might have no relevance. But when strung together, it goes to show a pattern of uncertainty and obscure truths from government officials. If we don't learn the game, we're nothing more than sheep.
There is no pattern here. There is a mishmash of things that people claim the government is lying about. When strung together it doesn't give evidence of anything, because none of them are evidence of anything on their own.
originally posted by: Jamie1
When Islamic militants commit an atrocity, the pattern is to deflect attention from those who committed mass murder, and their stated reason for committing mass murder, and then to accuse the government of committing the mass murder that the Islamic militants committed.
originally posted by: TheArrow
So, if it likely wasn't faked, what motives are we questioning?
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: TheArrow
With each one of those incidents, there were 'facts' that government officials released, that when dug deeper into, were proven lies.
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: TheArrow
With each one of those incidents, there were 'facts' that government officials released, that when dug deeper into, were proven lies. This raised more questions than answers. The pattern is that we are not getting the complete truth when it comes to incidents such as these. It'd argue that's the very purpose of ATS.
Everything the government tells us should be under suspicion until irrefutable proof comes to light.
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: TheArrow
He basically made the point that everything should be questioned. That's hardly nothing.
Actually, his response is nothing.
Lumping a bunch of other incidents with some vague supposition isn't anything.
Well tell me, what have YOU contributed to this discussion?
I asked one important question that no one seems to be able to answer.
Why would this be faked. Why would one death be faked in such a way that could be easily verified? This police officer has friends, family, and a life. What would be the point of faking this one death?
originally posted by: thesmokingman
For one, we dont even know if this was the cop that died.
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: thesmokingman
For one, we dont even know if this was the cop that died.
Tell his family and friends that, or are they CIA plants as well?
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: TheArrow
He basically made the point that everything should be questioned. That's hardly nothing.
Actually, his response is nothing.
Lumping a bunch of other incidents with some vague supposition isn't anything.
Well tell me, what have YOU contributed to this discussion?
I asked one important question that no one seems to be able to answer.
Why would this be faked. Why would one death be faked in such a way that could be easily verified? This police officer has friends, family, and a life. What would be the point of faking this one death?
For one, we dont even know if this was the cop that died. Remember there was another cop car that was riddled with bullet holes in it. To tell you the truth, the way I am leaning at the moment, is that this attack may have been carried out by western intelligence/CIA/Mossad? Trying to further demonize muslims, and perhaps to get France on board with the fight against ISIS. Again, it may or may not be faked. Time will tell hopefully though.
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: TheArrow
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: TheArrow
He basically made the point that everything should be questioned. That's hardly nothing.
Actually, his response is nothing.
Lumping a bunch of other incidents with some vague supposition isn't anything.
Well tell me, what have YOU contributed to this discussion?
I asked one important question that no one seems to be able to answer.
Why would this be faked. Why would one death be faked in such a way that could be easily verified? This police officer has friends, family, and a life. What would be the point of faking this one death?
For one, we dont even know if this was the cop that died. Remember there was another cop car that was riddled with bullet holes in it. To tell you the truth, the way I am leaning at the moment, is that this attack may have been carried out by western intelligence/CIA/Mossad? Trying to further demonize muslims, and perhaps to get France on board with the fight against ISIS. Again, it may or may not be faked. Time will tell hopefully though.
Hahaha this is awesome!
Arrow, this is the pattern I just referred to.
Islamic terrorist commit mass murder, then blame the CIA and Israel when there is zero evidence for their "false flag" theory.
It's a joke.
Just like questioning whether it was the cartoonists or the Islamic terrorists that were the "bullies" in the situation.
You've entered in a thread whose entire purpose was to deflect attention from the mass murders, and blame the U.S. and Israel.
You don't have to "lean" to draw this conclusion. It's right here in front of you. Zero evidence to present, then concluding it was the U.S. and Israel who killed 13 people in France.
And for what? To tarnish the reputation of Islamic militants, who just slaughtered 130 school kids in Pakistan, and 2,000 people in Nigeria.
Pathetic.