It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thesmokingman
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: thesmokingman
We haven't had much to agree on before but I'm with you. A couple if times I've said freedom of speech comes with responsibility. Responses? Crickets.
Something is inherently wrong and I don't know what it is. Arrogance?
I totally agree. You can say whatever you want, just be ready to accept the repercussions of said speech. Also, yes, I believe it is extreme arrogance.
originally posted by: arpgme
a reply to: thesmokingman
Freedom of speech does not includes things that are already illegal like harassment or threats.
originally posted by: phinubian
a reply to: thesmokingman
I live in the USA, I have never or heard of this magazine, the thing is I saw a picture that one of my coworkers showed me and it was the normal just a picture , he said that is what started it, so since I got home and since I last commented I was operating on that image, now, it took me awhile to troll youtube and I saw some of the comics, and to say the least, I don't think that ATS might allow some of them up, I also saw them making caricatures of other religions, so now I have use that information to come back and possibly change my vote, there is a line, if you were to go look at the vulgar comics you might not let your kids see, well guess with the internet unfiltered they may have seen it all.
I would challenge anyone to go get some of the cartoons and post them up, I bet you they get banned, I am not going to elaborate any more than that, the only thing I might think of now, after seeing some of these cartoons was, possibly the old depictions in cartoons back in the 30's and 40's that showed the stereotypical exaggerated, eyes,noses or lips of certain ethnic groups, the kind of thing that yes here in America, except some showing homosexual acts etc.. there is free speech, but because of taste you don't see these types of images or pictures anymore in Hollywood or the mainstream press... again I just had a chance to look at the uncensored comics from that newspaper, still I do not think it rose to the level of people being killed, that was ridiculous, but I thought I would come back to weigh on what I just saw and had no clue of...
originally posted by: th3dudeabides
a reply to: thesmokingman
a persons rights end where another's begins. Threats of violence violate another's rights hence bullying is not protected speech and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent.
originally posted by: mugger
a reply to: thesmokingman
Justify the killing of people over cartoons over private comments by Sterling? No way Sterling is right,pretty pathetic to try and link him with this, whether tongue in cheek comment.
originally posted by: Forensick
You have a responsibility for what you say and how people may react to that. Recently a chap in England was arrested for tweeting a joke that was offensive to some people, a joke!
But you have choices to not be a victim too, just dont buy and read the comics/film.
There are millions of Muslims in France who probably know quite well what the Comic was priniting but chose not to read it and not to be offended.
So it cannot be bullying, because it isnt forced upon you, you have the choice to turn the other cheek. And seriously, if the thought of someone disliking your choice of religion and mocking it makes you so angry you want to kill or feel like you are being bullied, then IMO its that person that is the problem.
The comic was just an excuse for fanatical terrorists at some kind of justification.
originally posted by: eletheia
One word ..... Frankie Boyle?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Krazysh0t
However, I find it very disturbing that you can have your entire life destroyed for holding a private opinion that is unpopular. How many of us at ATS would be similarly crucified in the court of public opinion and stand to lose everything?
Was there any evidence that his opinions caused him to treat his players or associates in an unfair manner in his business dealings? If not, then however unsavory, his opinions remained just that - his opinions. But it seems these days they are enough to get you fired. Look at the Mozilla CEO and now the Atlanta Fire Chief who have suffered similar fates for similar unpopular opinions. Did those opinions color how they handled their professional life? If there is no evidence of it, then there should be no repercussions for holding unpopular opinions, and any actions taken because of them is only bullying done by the public PC police to attempt to enforce "correct" thought on everyone.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
It certainly does suck that such things can happen. I won't disagree with you, but that is just one of the consequences of free speech. Everyone has an opinion and sometimes the majority of those opinions may be that they don't like you for some reason. All you can do is argue your case with your own freedom of speech and hope people start believing you.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: eletheia
Sticks and stones will break my bones but names will never hurt me? That one? I'm pretty sure elementary kids are still saying that to each other during recess.
But in any case, yes losing your life over something you said is bad. So I guess that means its up to you to watch what
you say lest you reap violence
originally posted by: eletheia
OOPS ...well there goes freedom of speech