It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neo96
Think that started with net neutrailty ?
Crony capitalism has been a mainstay in America since Franklin held a monopoly on printing.
A sweet no bid government contract if you will.
I'm paying for 50mb download speeds why shouldn't I get 50mb download speeds?
originally posted by: neo96
I have zero faith, and credit in them.
originally posted by: Staroth
I get the feeling this will lead to customers paying per bandwidth, something we do NOT need as we pay enough for internet as it is! Also fair to note I haven't researched it entirely just read a little here and there coupled with a gut feeling.
If it ain't broke - don't fix it!
So then why do you want them to spend months/years collaborating with corporations to create the Hybrid Approach for broadband?
Common Carrier reclassification of broadband requires no new laws/regulations.
So what are you doing to get the Healthcare and Insurance Lobbyists out of our Government?
Yeah, and ?
Have you ever been throttled down? I haven't.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: jacobe001
So what are you doing to get the Healthcare and Insurance Lobbyists out of our Government?
There is only one way to diminish lobbying.
Shrink the size, and power of government.
originally posted by: jacobe001
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: jacobe001
So what are you doing to get the Healthcare and Insurance Lobbyists out of our Government?
There is only one way to diminish lobbying.
Shrink the size, and power of government.
You show me what you would shrink and I will show you the toes of "Evil" corporations that you would be stepping on that would fight tooth and nail from you doing as much.
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
originally posted by: ketsuko
I don't know , but it seems to me that anytime you get the government more involved people wind up paying more.
That's the rub. The fear-mongerers have kept pumping the idea that Net Neutrality requires more government regulation and laws. It's an outright lie to fool you.
The Net Neutrality proposals involve classifying broadband as a common carrier under existing FCC/Federal laws. In fact, much of Verizon's FIOS fibre optic access is right now classified as a common carrier because they used the rights of way to install the lines. Verizon desperately wants to undo that.
It's the FCC's Hybrid Approach that would require a mountain of new laws and regulations.
Achieving Net Neutrality through common carrier classification requires no new laws or regulations.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Government never misses a chance to add in fees.
Funny how they think their only job is to create laws, and not get rid of any.
originally posted by: IntroduceALittleIrony
You honestly believe that this whole thing which will be enforced by the government, wont end up benefiting telecom lobbyists so long as they pay up?