It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Curiosity: Potential Anomalies (2015)

page: 37
34
<< 34  35  36    38  39  40 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 11:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Clonevandal

I see a semi buried cracked Bell.

a woodpecker with the triangular eye

an alien in a cowl looking at a triangular object

very pixely at this much zoom

funbox




posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: funbox

That's what I see:



if the image wasn't of such poor quality...



posted on Aug, 13 2015 @ 04:20 PM
link   
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...




Is this a building?



posted on Aug, 13 2015 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Clonevandal

It's a rock.



posted on Aug, 13 2015 @ 05:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Clonevandal
Is this a building?

No, just a small outcrop with too much JPEG artefacts.



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 01:26 AM
link   
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...







There are like flowers growing up in this crack of the soil.
I'm not very good with photoshop and the enhancements are hard to do.



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 04:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Clonevandal

More rocks.



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 05:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Clonevandal

Rocks my world (and by world I mean Mars). That's a major claim - an Earthshattering claim (and by Earth I mean Mars) - about a very photoshopped picture. So nah, no flowers, until I see the bees circling.



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 05:48 AM
link   
I can see easy the flowers without touching anything of the image:


Save the pic and zoom in the arrows, and you will see the flowers very clear

And I know that's a major claim, but i can't do nothing if I see flowers like that in front of my eyes.
edit on 14-8-2015 by Clonevandal because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 06:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Clonevandal
I can see easy the flowers without touching anything of the image:


...except you have touched the image.

I see more rocks.

This is a well-understood psychological illusion:


Pareidolia (/pærɨˈdoʊliə/ parr-i-doh-lee-ə) is a psychological phenomenon involving a stimulus (an image or a sound) wherein the mind perceives a familiar pattern where none actually exists.

Common examples are perceived images of animals, faces, or objects in cloud formations, the "man in the moon", the "moon rabbit", and hidden messages within recorded music played in reverse or at higher- or lower-than-normal speeds.

Pareidolia is the visual or auditory form of apophenia, which is the perception of patterns within random data. Combined with apophenia and hierophany (manifestation of the sacred), pareidolia may have helped ancient societies organize chaos and make the world intelligible.[1][2]


en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 06:35 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

carefull.. you might wake perry *sniff* ;D



funbox



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 07:28 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

But who decides which of us is viewing a pareidolia? You, who confuse flowers with rocks or I?



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 07:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Clonevandal

You're claiming to see a whole range of implausible and unrelated objects. The evidence needed to confirm this would be FAR more extraordinary and compelling than you claiming that a bunch of rocks vaguely looks like something that not supported by any other corroborating evidence.

Until you can offer up any such evidence, they're just rocks.

So we have two scenarios here:

1) You're falling victim to a well-known psychological phenomenon by claiming that what we expect to see and what all other evidence suggests (rocks) is something else entirely (flowers, etc.).

2) The rocks are, in fact, something utterly extraordinary and implausible that is counter to everything we know and what all other evidence suggests.

Which is more likely?
edit on 14-8-2015 by GetHyped because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 07:55 AM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

hey ArMaP

any news on the windspeed and humidity data yet ?
did they manage to sort their data sets out ?


funbox



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 08:07 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

I like option 2 more.

right = original
left = only auto color







I hope that they show a more quality image of this area, i would be happy with a Tif of 100MB.
edit on 14-8-2015 by Clonevandal because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-8-2015 by Clonevandal because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 08:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Clonevandal
a reply to: GetHyped

I like option 2 more.


Feels do not trump reals.

Just take stock for a moment. You're posting pixelated images of ROCKS and concluding "thus, aliens!". Mars is cool enough without having to make # up.



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 11:42 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

I think rock is too looser term , lets break them down into elements , maybe mix it up into a compound, in a sense where sometimes they do have an unusual appearance to them , and sometimes they're suggestive of more than their elemental component, as if some peculiar, ill understood, life force has taken possession of them ,contrived/contriving to shape them unto it's own nefarious purposes



funbox



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: funbox
any news on the windspeed and humidity data yet ?

I don't know, I forgot about that.



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Clonevandal

One of the problems with JPEG compression is that it changes the colours.



posted on Aug, 14 2015 @ 04:01 PM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

luckily I don't forget , especially as they indicate so much, but I think we both know we'll be waiting a long day in hell for it


funbox




top topics



 
34
<< 34  35  36    38  39  40 >>

log in

join