posted on Jan, 4 2015 @ 05:00 PM
Before you accuse me of "race-baiting" please read this:
I am not making unfair statements, or attacking any racial group.
The purpose of this post is to report the story, and discuss it.
The story: protesters storm restaurants in NYC during lunch and target and harass diners in an effort to make some statement about the recent deaths
of black suspects.
Question: Do you think protesters self-identifying their protests as "black brunch" are doing anything to help their cause, or do you think
interrupting and harassing diners having lunch is stupid, rude, and counterproductive?
My perspective is this will be so incredibly counter-productive to their stated cause that it almost looks like a conspiracy to hurt their cause
instead of further it. If I was advising somebody on what to do to sway public opinion against the protesters, I couldn't come up with a better
"Hey.... I have an idea. We can make sure that NOBODY has any sympathy left for them. Let's hire some protesters to go into restaurants and harass
white people having lunch!"
It's so unreal, and counterproductive, it's almost like a false flag for social unrest, with the end game being an escalation of the police state.
This is better...
edit on 4-1-2015 by Jamie1 because: (no reason given)