posted on Jan, 4 2015 @ 05:48 AM
Last night I watched the Sky Press Review Where we had the Royal Commentator as a guest with another journalist reviewing the front pages of the
Gues What? Althouth they did show the papers with the sensational Prince Andrew and the Queen in talks on their front pages, not one mention of this
matter was covered last night - so if you haven't seen censorship before - you have now on Sky! Is its boss after some kind of gong from the british
honours list? Would he deserve it anyway for the number of repeats he sells to us viewers and when he bows to buckingham palace's demands for
This is about Andrew's relationship with Epstein and the embarrassing problem of Epstein being a buddy of Jimmy Saville and the scandal of sexual
abuse - somthing icky for our royals. Birds of a feather flock together and that's something the british public will think. One newspaper said
that Andrew is seeking diplomatic protection so he may be excused from being dragged over to the USA kickinbg and screaming although I thought our
government gave the Yanks the right to grab british citizens for trial in the USA so will he be interviewed and prosecuted? You have to ask yourself
why a young American girl, with no link to the british royalty, should have singled him out. Also why would he choose to be a buddy of Epstein's as
well as Saville although whom were into young boys as well as saville's girls.
It has long been known to those who are interested or dislike the royals, that a member of the royal family has had rumours circulating for a number
of years - so now Andrew has popped into the frame and we have a clue as to which one it is. I expect he has a lot of explanations for his mother,
whom will no doubt slap as many D notices or whatever immunity she can get her paws on to protect her privilege and keep them all sitting pretty.
Linking Andrew to Saville was being accepted but when you bring in Epstein and the possible procurement of young girls for sexual abuse, although
Epstein would have had no interest in them, this revellation makes one look a layer deeper at Andrew - whom is the main liability after his elder
brother to the rspectability of british throne as his scandals regularly occur but are kept as quiet as possible.
Philip Schofield gave cameron a list of paedophiles on which a member of the royal household was named. Cameron was furious about this and has done
nothing about it. I hope he rethinks his lack of action as this is not going to go away despite the elephant in the room on last nights Sky's Press
Review - which was so awkward it was embarrassing to watch. Two intelligent people reviewing the same stores again and such trivial matter makes it
not work watching sky news at all. I am now wondering about my Sky payment and will probably swop in disgust - either do the job you have forced
yourself into or get out murdock if it gets too hot for you. ~People deserve a good investigative press which is something that has died recently and
I would have thought you would have wanted to bring back to put you on the top again.
edit on 4-1-2015 by Shiloh7 because: Sorry thought I
had no heading but I did