It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: CrawlingChaos
Not to butt in...but your confusion in this post is premised on fully buying the Frank Lutz creation of "Job Creators"?
Otherwise ..."the Wealthy" does not equal "Job Creators"...
Consumer Demand creates jobs...aka Consumer Class/Middle Class..Demand for a product increases and companies expand to meet demand, if they don't have full finances to do so, banks lend.
But giving the wealthy more money does not create jobs.
Trickle down economics as a mechanism for growth is like trying to fuel your car by spraying gas on the engine.
Consumer Demand creates jobs
Demand for a product increases and companies expand to meet demand, if they don't have full finances to do so, banks lend.
But giving the wealthy more money does not create jobs.
Trickle down economics as a mechanism for growth is like trying to fuel your car by spraying gas on the engine.
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Answer
I am well aware of the institution of taxes. Income tax was devised to pay for a certain war....
The current Progressive Tax system was created to hold in check the railroad and robber barons. It didn't work.
And are you actually suggesting that taxes got the US out of the Great Depression??
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Indigo5
Consumer Demand creates jobs
No, capital, creates jobs. Consumer demand creates a job-market...
Demand for a product increases and companies expand to meet demand, if they don't have full finances to do so, banks lend.
And where does this capital for lending & investment come from ?
But giving the wealthy more money does not create jobs.
Who is "giving" money to the wealthy ? If you mean using your money to make money, that's known as "earning" not "giving" money.
Trickle down economics as a mechanism for growth is like trying to fuel your car by spraying gas on the engine.
So, by your statement, Answer's proposal of decreasing taxes on capital to fuel economic growth won't work... But taxing the heck out of it, will...
Don't agree with that. /shrug
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: Answer
You have removed all other aspects of those time periods and basically placed the whole taxing of the rich in a vacuum, and used the results as your basis.
Very very simple. Taxing someone higher, then others, regardless of the reason is wrong. The ends don't justify the means.
It is theft from everyone. Now, you suggest a higher amount of theft from some, because (insert reason).
So, morals are right out the door, as you suggest a few carrying more weight then others, because they have more.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Indigo5
Consumer Demand creates jobs
No, capital, creates jobs. Consumer demand creates a job-market...
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Indigo5
And where does this capital for lending & investment come from ?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Indigo5
And where does this capital for lending & investment come from ?
Through banks and loans (Depositor funds) that first and above all else see a strong potential for a solid and secure return..aka Increasing Demand.
The average depositor to banks is the workhorse of expansion to meet demand in the form of small and large business loans.
The average wealthy investors invest internationally for quick and large returns...futures, options, currency markets..in and out in stock speculation, hedge funds etc. You don't call up the Koch brothers for a business loan.
And wealthy investors under current tax policy are actually incentivized to make money through those non-job producing vehicles (unearned income) vs. putting their money to work in the economy.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
So, by your statement, Answer's proposal of decreasing taxes on capital to fuel economic growth won't work... But taxing the heck out of it, will...
Don't agree with that. /shrug
The Congressional Budget Office predicted that the expiration of these tax cuts would have only minor, short-term effects on the economy. Conservatives made far more dire assessments. A study commissioned by pro-business organizations predicted that ending the Bush tax cuts for the rich would cost hundreds of thousands of jobs and reduce economic productivity. “This report shows the president's small business tax hike threatens hundreds of thousands of jobs, and will lead to even less economic growth, less investment and lower wages for American workers,” warned John Boehner. “These tax increases will have painful impacts on the economy and job creation,” insisted the Heritage Foundation. These predictions were the perfectly predictable expression of the conservative worldview, which deems tax rates on “job creators” to be the overriding factor in the success or failure of the economy.
Almost nothing that has happened in the two years since has made that conservative argument look good. In February 2013 — just after the Bush tax cuts on the highest earners expired — the Congressional Budget Office published a forecast for the budget and the economy over the next several years. The CBO forecast that the unemployment rate would fall to 7.6 percent by the end of 2014. If the conservative analysis was correct, and higher tax rates on job creators were depressing job growth, we might expect the unemployment rate today to be higher than the CBO forecast. Instead it is much lower. Unemployment fell below 6 percent by the third quarter of last year. Indeed, the economy appears to be accelerating into a phase of more rapid growth just at the time conservatives predicted that higher taxes would have the opposite effect. This development has not given Republicans even the slightest pause.