posted on Jan, 3 2015 @ 08:00 AM
Short answer: one that deviates more strongly than ever, or by FAR, from the "official" Biblical stories, and portrays him as a MAN - not "God" or
"Son of God" - with the great soul of an Ascended Master.
Mind you, I'm not starry-eyed enough to outright believe such a movie could ever be made, within the existing political world. Think there was a
backlash about THE INTERVIEW, or as a closer comparison, THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST back in the late '80s? This would make those look like a mere
toddler fussing about his/her freshly soiled diaper. Perhaps outrage would be an understatement.
This is my idea for the first part of the opening scene: First shot is of a large black spacecraft in orbit over Earth, specifically over the eastern
Mediterranean shore region. Next shots are a few quick ones of the spacecraft's interior - a futuristic-luxurious and spacious area where the
inhabitants are a combination of (ET) humans and various nonhumans.
Next begins in a conference room where seated at a large table are several (10 or so) men who are mostly humans. The human male who is the architect
or "ring leader" of the grand project-conspiracy speaks first. He says, "The insemination has been done; the boy will be born to the virgin mother
in about nine months." There is a combination of groans of protest-disapproval, and smiles and words of approval - mostly the latter - from the
attendees. He then asserts to the dissenters, "We simply have no other choice. There HAS to be a new monotheistic religion because there MUST be
something that can accomplish a large scale conversion of the pagan and other Gentile masses, since the exclusive or CHOSEN nature of the Hebrews
never has been or will be about that. We have almost finished writing the entire script, and the programming will begin in earnest when the new
god-child is born. When the boy becomes a man, what he actually does and says matters not at all. What matters is what will be WRITTEN about him, or
what receives the proper publicity therefore authority, which we shall always control entirely."
He explains further, "Most but not all of you are aware that I am a direct descendant of Florkish of Plookers, the one known to the original
Abrahamics as simply 'Yahweh' or the so-called nameless one. My family name is Plookers. The very few of you who are aware of the original, actual
events of those days know how VERY different the spoken, and much later written, narrative is from what really happened. We will be doing the same
basic thing with the new religion, and it will not be a unique one that is entirely separate from the Hebrews, but an offshoot of them. In fact, it
has been decided to present the appearance of fulfillment of the Emmanuel prophecy - so-called prophecy - from the Isaiah book in the Torah, the
Hebrews' new holy text. His name will not actually BE Emmanuel, but since Emmanuel means 'God is with us,' his followers will never know the
difference. Actually a friend of one of my assistants suggested the fairly common name Yeshua, so we will begin the subconscious programming of that
name into the boy's father's - or male parent's - mind right away."
I could go on with more dialog and ideas, but that's enough to show that, from the outset, this would be something that would make the dogmatists go
probably beyond ballistic, yet NOT primarily for the sake of agitation or rabble-rousing. The purpose or objective is to be a teaching of the higher
consciousness in general that is above any mere religion. It's a story about the conflict between the totalitarian-authoritarian, enslaving ways of
Plookers and his ilk, and the minority dissenters who truly love Jesus who were/are in favor of the objective, closer to Gnostic truth.
Though it would be strongly emphasized as a work of fiction, it would also be pointed out that, since there is no real evidence, let alone proof, that
the "official" or permitted stories are true, for all we KNOW, this portrayal could be closer to the truth.