It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The real issue here is someone has made a accusation, without any evidence, and some people have got a lynch party already!
originally posted by: HumanPLC
originally posted by: Tangerine
Shouldn't this be posted in the Lynched Without A Trial forum?
Its nothing to do with a lynching, its just the trial that people want. A fair and unbias trial where the factual evidence is laid out and you are judged by your peers on the strength of this evidence. Pretty much the same as what us 'common' folk could expect if we were accused in the same way as some of these people have been.
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
Well it certainly seems to be coming to light regarding the royals
This has been known about for years by the likes of David Icke and I just hope people will delve into the wide range of study He has brought forward.
anyone with a dash of common sense can see the writing on the wall.
The royals are true scum fact!
It is amazing how most people in England dote over these psychos
why they consider themselves supreme
and ultimately rule over us
originally posted by: Shiloh7
I remember Andrew being reported as telling Koo Stark that she couldn't touch him nobody could touch the british royal family.
Princess Anne has been fined £400 after admitting driving her Bentley at 93mph on a dual carriageway in Gloucestershire. Cheltenham magistrates also gave her a five-point endorsement on her licence and ordered her to pay £30 costs.
originally posted by: Shiloh7
a reply to: HumanPLC
If its documented in an American court trial then you do have a witness - which means evidence.
The original list for Elm Grove that I think MI5 had included 'a member of the royal household' and that is the main reason why this investigation in this country has stalled - its not only the high profile of people from institutions that were put in place to protect childrenm the police themselves, MP's and ministers at that, but its the royal household that will cling like a leach to the british tax income they derive and the position of priviledge no one else gets in the world unless they are oil shirks. At last we have the name of the One who mustn't be named albeit a girl.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: rickymouse
Do people in the UK also not understand what they read?
The girl is going after Epstein, not the prince.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
This thing has blown up more because of who he is than what he did.
The document – a motion to expand an ongoing lawsuit relating to prosecutors’ handling of Epstein’s case with two new plaintiffs – alleges that the woman “was forced to have sexual relations with this prince when she was a minor” in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein.