It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
Read about that earlier.
(I considered posting it but wondered if it was worth it. I consider it brave that you did. Too many things have happened to me in the past for speaking out about such things.)
Please could you elaborate. Firstly, this sounds very interesting indeed if true. If not, who's to say that you are spreading fear to prevent others from speaking out ?edit on 2-1-2015 by sayzaar because: mistake with quoting text.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Pretty much anybody can name anybody in a lawsuit. Being named in a lawsuit is a far cry from being "exposed." It's being named in a lawsuit.
What happens next will be far more telling than simply being named in the suit.
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
I think it's worth pointing out this story has nothing to do with the alleged paedophile ring in the upper echelons of the British establishment. That's another matter completely.
originally posted by: liteonit6969
a reply to: stumason
What do you mean embarrassing? It isnt just sex.....it is rape...sex slave. This was without consent and is a crime. Anyone else would be in custody. I am sure alot more is going to come to light. I also remember that epstein had tried to hide his links to the Prince, now i see why.
Also Epstein has been linked to abusing children and thus by association Prince Andrew will be too. Thats why to attempt to cut ties and hide all.
Why not? A weird thing to say considering the prevailing feeling on ATS is that the Royals should be "despised" for holding themselves above us
with the revelations of his apparently indefatigable search for the finest golf courses around the globe, during which he has clocked up substantial travel costs. Palace accounts show that in the 12 months to April, the 44-year-old prince spent £325,000 on flights, including £2,939 on a helicopter to make the 120-mile round trip to Oxford, and RAF planes to fly to St Andrews for two golfing jaunts.
Last week, in the eyes of the tabloids, the shameless scion of Windsor was at it again: taking an RAF jet to Northern Ireland, where he squeezed in a round of golf before arriving at a royal garden party several hours after it had begun.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: gortex
but my mate woke up in the morning with a 15 year old and she started claiming she was raped (she was more than willing the night before though)
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
Michael Jackson was exposed at least twice. The victim was paid off and he is still treated like royalty instead of the child molester he was.
this will be a repeat scenario most likely even if he is innocent.
originally posted by: HumanPLC
a reply to: stumason
Thats news to me, where is the UK Legislation that says that?
Its rape mate, plain as!