It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: liteonit6969
a reply to: 3danimator2014
First of all i didnt say Prince Andrew was a pedophile, i said he is NAMED in a pedophile and sex slave case. You say she was only 17 and just below the age to make porn??????????? are you serious??????????
Id love to hear that excuse in court. ha.
Pedophile is the correct definition.--------having sexual feelings towards children.
Child definition-------a young person below the age of majority.
The age of majority in this case is 18.
This is a case of a Pedophile, sex slave etc.
Now you should be ashamed of yourself instead of making excuses and focusing on a headline you should be looking at the issue here, how a young girl not only is allowed to be in the position she was, but how she was taken advantage of and yes raped and treated as a slave. Disgusting but to be honest im not surprised that these people in high places conduct themselves like this.
originally posted by: corsair00
Get all of the best psychologists of the world together to vote on a worldwide legal age of consent for in-person and online sexuality and straighten out the laws concerning recorded/digitized imagery i.e. pornography. Adolescent sexuality cannot be made illegal - that's like making biological life illegal. Widespread proliferation of downloadable content should be decriminalized and legal focus centered on more pressing concerns.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Ridhya
Who forced her is the better question. If the other guy forced her, and as far as Andrew knew she was a cute girl and was consenting, there is no crime by Andrew.
I wouldn't bet the bank on it.