It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
I'm getting a little tired of the whole "it's no one else's fault - she made her own choice" crap. Yes it's true that no one forced her to commit suicide - it was her choice. But she felt like it was the most valid choice she could make, based on how she was being treated.
Example: I've seen threads on here that tell stories about people abusing/neglecting/starving infants/children. People get on those threads and scream and shout how angry it makes them, and how they would love to torture/kill those people for what they did to the innocent children. Why have that reaction? Why not choose to be forgiving to those people? Because you feel like your choice to be angry is a valid choice, considering what those people did. Do you blame yourself for your reaction or do you blame the abusers of children for your reaction?
Another Example: Lets say the government finally does what every gun lover has been afraid of -- they say it's time to start taking guns away from people, and have much stricter rules on who is allowed to have guns. What would be the gun lover's reaction? How would they choose to react? I can pretty much predict how they will react. Why don't they choose another way to react? Why don't they just accept it and be happy without their guns? Who is responsible for the way the gun lovers react? The gun lovers themselves, or the government?
This poor girl was treated badly by the very people she depended on to help her. She felt like her choice to commit suicide was a valid choice, based on other's actions towards her. Why do we move so fast to blame her for her choice/reaction, and not the ones who made her feel the need to have that reaction?
originally posted by: Annee
This was a transgender teen who wanted to start medical treatment to stop the affects of Testosterone.
He did make his choices. He was denied the right of those choices by his religious parents.
He knew what he needed to be happy. It was denied.
As he said, by age 18 it would be too late. The Testosterone would have already changed his appearance.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: Klassified
Being the parent of four children, ages 47 to 27, I can say in retrospect I failed them miserably.
I can't imagine the guilt they must live with.
originally posted by: Jamie1
It was 100% her choice, based on the the meaning SHE gave to her outside conditions.
She didn't NEED to have that reaction. She chose to have that reaction.
Encouraging people to feel bad based on their outside circumstances is NOT helping them. It's keeping them stuck. Why teach people their feelings and actions are at the mercy of people they can't control.
I work with women whose parents and brothers had sex with them. That's a fact. It happened. It can't be undone.
Gender dysmorphia is a pretty difficult and complicated issue.
The causes of gender dysphoria are not yet fully understood. Gender dysphoria was traditionally thought to be a psychiatric condition, with its causes believed to originate in the mind. However, more recent studies have suggested that gender dysphoria is biological and caused by the development of gender identity before birth. The condition is not a mental illness.
Based on the cross-cultural information presented here, we conclude that the diagnostic category of GIDC should not occur in its current form in future editions of the DSM, as there is no compelling evidence that cross-gender behaviors or identities, in and of themselves, cause distress in the individual.
Regardless of what the cause of the kid's feelings were; he needed actual therapy, not 500cc of Jesus.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
So before we put the blame all upon the way the parents handled this, consider the chance it is body dysmorphic disorder.
originally posted by: Pinke
originally posted by: Jamie1
It was 100% her choice, based on the the meaning SHE gave to her outside conditions.
She didn't NEED to have that reaction. She chose to have that reaction.
Encouraging people to feel bad based on their outside circumstances is NOT helping them. It's keeping them stuck. Why teach people their feelings and actions are at the mercy of people they can't control.
I work with women whose parents and brothers had sex with them. That's a fact. It happened. It can't be undone.
If you look at your language, you'll notice all of this involves third party involvement.
It's a statistical fact that if a person receives mostly bad inputs growing up, you will get bad outcomes. This might be uncomfortable for some people to accept but a lot of what we do isn't down to our choices good or bad. A good pile of it is circumstance and genetics.
That said, you're right. Encouraging people to feel bad is not helpful. That doesn't mean that this person's sole reason for committing suicide can be pithily ignored as a 'choice' to make everyone feel better about themselves.
And for any person that thinks being trans is 'glorified' ... come out to your family, cross dress for a few months, get disowned a few times, enjoy the increased rate of murder and suicide then pull your head out your butt.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Jamie1
So the parents and brothers who committed incest have no accountability? From the way you are talking, there is no such thing as a victim, therefore there is no such thing as a crime.
originally posted by: Jamie1
Yes, the person's sole reason for committing suicide was that person's choice.
What can't be ignored is that the two people can experience identical outside circumstances and make dramatically different choices in the meanings they give to the circumstances.
originally posted by: eNumbra
Regardless of what the cause of the kid's feelings were; he needed actual therapy, not 500cc of Jesus.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
So before we put the blame all upon the way the parents handled this, consider the chance it is body dysmorphic disorder.
His parents betrayed him.
originally posted by: Pinke
originally posted by: Jamie1
Yes, the person's sole reason for committing suicide was that person's choice.
What can't be ignored is that the two people can experience identical outside circumstances and make dramatically different choices in the meanings they give to the circumstances.
If this was true there would be a roughly equal distribution of suicides in all demographics, and there would be little correlation between therapeutic methods and outcomes. Being a victim of child abused wouldn't reliably raise people's chances of committing certain types of crimes etc ... This isn't the case.
There is a difference between enforcing personal responsibility and what you're implying - that there are no other contributing factors.
originally posted by: Jamie1
originally posted by: Annee
This was a transgender teen who wanted to start medical treatment to stop the affects of Testosterone.
He did make his choices. He was denied the right of those choices by his religious parents.
He knew what he needed to be happy. It was denied.
As he said, by age 18 it would be too late. The Testosterone would have already changed his appearance.
He didn't need medical treatment to stop the affects of testosterone to be happy.