It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: seeker1963
That isn't what I asked you. I asked how I am giving any politicians leeway? What have I said that comes off as going easy on politicians?
How do I give any politicians any leeway?
originally posted by: Kali74
So again I have to ask... when was Capitalism not international?
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
I am personally MORE interested to see what the Nicaragua Canal will do to these trade relations. That is being built by a Hong Kong company and will kill the Panama Canal operation pretty quickly. With someone other than the US owning the main canal, which will become the Nicaragua Canal, it will make shipping efforts by the US a lot more interesting. Russia is heavily involved in the Nicaragua Canal building as well, which began December of last year and is slated to finish within 5 years. The Hong Kong company behind it has a 50 year concession, followed by another 50 once completed. That would KILL the US trade relations with everyone.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: lostbook
The Obama haters will be along soon to tell you that this means sod all, & the estimates will be questioned ferociously.
Personally, this is just as big as Russia's deals with China & India.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
I am personally MORE interested to see what the Nicaragua Canal will do to these trade relations.
Under the exclusive contract, Wang can skip building the canal (and making any payments to Nicaragua) and instead simply operate lucrative tax-free side projects.[46]
"The contract with HKND was approved by President Ortega without any consultation with Nicaraguan society and ratified unanimously by his party FSLN. The opposition party PLI walked out in protest. Many believe the contract is an act of high treason because there are no benefits to Nicaragua, as HKND will keep all of the revenues once the canal is in operation for 50 years, is not obligated to pay market prices for the land, does not have to use Nicaraguan construction companies or hire Nicaraguan workers and is not obligated by Nicaraguan laws. HKND does not have any civil engineering expertise and has been acussed of being a front for the Chinese government, which they deny. HKND seems not to have secured the capital needed for the project and is now asking for the land to be given to them on a 50 year credit or lease.
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: lostbook
I am not sure where or how your source came up with those figures?
So far the TPP has been highly secret with hardly any info at all about the specifics.
All I have seen is it clamps down on copyright violations and gives more power to corporations. But again, where is the information of this act and if it is so secret, why?
Other than that, IMO, if it was so great, not sure why the secrecy.......
If you can find anything about these actual trade agreements, please feel free to put them up. Otherwise, this article is baseless.
Here is a short video, but again, how do we know what is truth, when there is so much secrecy behind this?
originally posted by: stirling
Anybody detect a NWO consolidation effort taking place from both sides of the "iron curtain".....?
originally posted by: neo96
As such, it is estimated that TTIP will boost U.S. household incomes by $865 annually and create 750,000 new U.S. jobs, while TPP would generate about $1,230 per household by 2025–a great boost without a dime of deficit spending, and a strong bonus on top of the $10,000 annual income gains American households have already scored due to post-war trade opening.
Is the thread some kind of GD joke ?
Guess they forgot to deduct their healthcare premiums from that 'gain'.
Between that, and TAXES.
There would be a net gain of ZERO.
In 1993, NAFTA was sold to the U.S. public with grand promises. NAFTA would create hundreds of thousands of good jobs here -- 170,000 per year according the Peterson Institute for International Economics. U.S. farmers would export their way to wealth. NAFTA would bring Mexico to a first-world level of economic prosperity and stability, providing new economic opportunities there that would reduce immigration to the United States. Environmental standards would improve.
Techdirt has already discussed how NAFTA has proved disastrous for the US in basic financial terms; here we'll look at some of the other effects, not just in the US, but for Mexico too.
NAFTA has contributed to downward pressure on U.S. wages and growing income inequality. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, two out of every three displaced manufacturing workers who were rehired in 2012 experienced a wage reduction, most of them taking a pay cut of greater than 20 percent.
…
Despite a 188 percent rise in food imports from Canada and Mexico under NAFTA, the average nominal price of food in the United States has jumped 65 percent since the deal went into effect.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: pikestaff
The ability to sue governments applies to all corporations of all participating nations against all participating nations including the US.
I have heard the argument that transparency would undermine the administration's policy to complete the trade agreement because public opposition would be significant. If transparency would lead to widespread public opposition to a trade agreement, then that trade agreement should not be the policy of the United States. I believe in transparency and democracy and I think the US Trade Representative should too.