It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jeb Bush surges to double-digit lead among 2016 GOP presidential contenders

page: 2
7
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Who are you people, and where do you come up with these candidates? Rand Paul is the only potential GOP candidate who can win against the coming Clinton/Warren brigade.

Do you actually want to win?

Don't let the media choose our candidates for us.




posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: rupertg
The last time The GOP won a presidential race without a Nixon or a Bush on the ticket was in 1928.

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Maybe Karl Rove can sniff out some Nixon offspring in the fold.



uhhh....Reagan was elected in 1981

There's this new fangled thang called google...perhaps you've heard of it?




Desperate times call for desperate measures.



such as....
edit on 29-12-2014 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: neo96
[I haven't seen any one yet that i would support.


It doesn't matter who you support. It only matters who the billionaire oligarchs support.

Pick your feudal lord wisely.


Bingo!!! If Sheldon Adelson doesn't like him then he won't get the nomination.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: SkepticOverlord

It was great listening to Springer go into it last night on C2C.

Even got a NLBS plug in at the same time



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: MsAphrodite
Who are you people, and where do you come up with these candidates? Rand Paul is the only potential GOP candidate who can win against the coming Clinton/Warren brigade.

Do you actually want to win?

Don't let the media choose our candidates for us.


Sorry but Rand is pretty much out of it when it comes to running for the top spot VP maybe. He has said a few things against Israel and when running for President you must adhere to main rule of running for the office of President. Thou shalt not speak ill of Israel.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: neo96
[I haven't seen any one yet that i would support.


It doesn't matter who you support. It only matters who the billionaire oligarchs support.

Pick your feudal lord wisely.


I will disagree as we live under a Kleptocracy:



Kleptocracy, alternatively cleptocracy or kleptarchy, is a form of political and government corruption where the government exists to increase the personal wealth and political power of its officials and the ruling class at the expense of the wider population, often with pretense of honest service.



kleptocracy

Just my opinion though others will vary with mileage.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 05:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: rupertg
The last time The GOP won a presidential race without a Nixon or a Bush on the ticket was in 1928.

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Maybe Karl Rove can sniff out some Nixon offspring in the fold.



uhhh....Reagan was elected in 1981

There's this new fangled thang called google...perhaps you've heard of it?




Desperate times call for desperate measures.



such as....


(Cough cough Reagan - Bush)



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 05:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Jeb was Governor of Florida.

What was negative or positive with that timeframe?





To be honest with you I think he did a fairly good job here.

There were a couple issues that stored up some controversy over legislation but it has been so long since he held that office I can't remember what they were.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 05:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: rupertg
The last time The GOP won a presidential race without a Nixon or a Bush on the ticket was in 1928.

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Maybe Karl Rove can sniff out some Nixon offspring in the fold.



uhhh....Reagan was elected in 1981

There's this new fangled thang called google...perhaps you've heard of it?




Desperate times call for desperate measures.



such as....


Lets be fair by todays standards Reagan would be a democrat at the very least RINO. It was an easy mistake.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 05:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

Reagan a rino ?

That was hilarious.



Sounds like a GD teapariter to me.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 06:22 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Oh my bad lets not forget.

1. Reagan Gave Amnesty to Undocumented Immigrants

2. Reagan Shored Up Social Security

3. Reagan Was a Union Leader

4. Reagan Opposed Weaponization

5. Reagan Raised Taxes

Forget Rino the Tea Party would have called him a Communist.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Jeb was Governor of Florida.

What was negative or positive with that timeframe?





Are you kidding me?

Jeb was the governor of Florida during the 2000 "election"...

Yeah.. nothing to see here, folks...



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 07:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: DrJunk

originally posted by: xuenchen
Jeb was Governor of Florida.

What was negative or positive with that timeframe?





Are you kidding me?

Jeb was the governor of Florida during the 2000 "election"...

Yeah.. nothing to see here, folks...


So I am to assume that is a "positive"?

Maybe it was considering the alternative to Bush was Al Gore



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

If you consider the possibility of the will of the people being subverted a positive, it won't surprise me if you were a GOP member.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 07:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: DrJunk
a reply to: xuenchen

If you consider the possibility of the will of the people being subverted a positive, it won't surprise me if you were a GOP member.


Am I to assume that the 2000 election results were somehow fixed?

Astounding.




posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Judging from your retort about Gore being the alternative, you have already made your assumption about the election being fixed, and that you are okay with it, seeing as your candidate came out on top.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Bush has leftist type policies. So Hilary or Bush. Hilary will win because the Tea Party will no way in hell vote for Bush. I think the GOP is purposely throwing the election for puppet B. After all Bush and Clintons are like best friends. Bush is probably doing Clinton a favor to squash any true conservative winning the nomination.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: MsAphrodite

Bush is there to block Rand from winning. I'm sure there is already back room deals with Clinton. They know Rand can beat her. Bush can't beat her and the GOP will throw the election, so she will win. Remember the establishment likes Obamacare they helped write it. The game is rigged. U always get leftist or leftist.



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 08:28 PM
link   
How the hell can this be happening?

Im conservative and I HATE Jeb Bush? who the hell wants another year of Bushs or Clintons in office?

This has to be fabricated data.....the people do not want Jeb.....



posted on Dec, 29 2014 @ 08:36 PM
link   
Well this is why ....



Former Massachusetts Governor Romney, by the way, was absent from CNN’s poll. Another recent poll put him ahead of Bush and the others, if he were to stage a surprise return to electoral politics.







top topics



 
7
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join