It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Still Think There should be Pentagon Video ?

page: 9
13
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 08:27 AM
link   
a reply to: UnderKingsPeak

Yes, they would like us to believe that the very heart and nerve center of the US Department of Defense, the body of the Military Industrial Complex, has only Radio Shack cameras and security systems, and they are not turned on.

That is an example of how tortured thinking is necessary to defend the official story.




posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 09:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Grimpachi

I don't think they need to reveal where they are, just give us a video showing the plane.

The only one out seems to be edited and at a dismal frame rate.



I have always had a problem with the time and date stamp on the video which was released.
Do you think some body was trying to tell us something and we have just failed to point it out enough to the rest of the public?



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 09:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Salander

Right, because cameras to record everything were a top priority, and the military always has top of the line equipment everywhere.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 09:36 AM
link   
a reply to: samkent




When was the last time you saw any video of a plane crash at any airport?


Not to say their is or isn't additional Pentagon video, but just because you haven't seen the videos doesn't mean their isn't one.



posted on Jan, 23 2015 @ 10:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Salander No, tortured thinking is that which is done by people who deny the reality of the wreckage and bodies of American Airlines Flight 77 in the carnage at the Pentagon. The US Military not having state of the art equipment...that is standard operating procedure.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 04:42 AM
link   
No video of a jet flying low altitude and slamming into the pentagon. No video or believable wreckage at Shanksville. I highly doubt 2 jets were even used to pull off the latter events. Then the movie September Clues seems to draw decent evidence that the first 2 planes were fake. So no planes used at all on 9/11?



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 05:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: truth0rdie
No video of a jet flying low altitude and slamming into the pentagon. No video or believable wreckage at Shanksville. I highly doubt 2 jets were even used to pull off the latter events. Then the movie September Clues seems to draw decent evidence that the first 2 planes were fake. So no planes used at all on 9/11?


I have to agree with you on that, its being decades now the fact how the last time i heard that FBI had confiscated not only the Pentagon vids but also some of the tower videos this should rise serious questions.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 05:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58



the military always has top of the line equipment everywhere.


I have to disagree with that one. If the military truly did have or had top of the line equipment everywhere. We would already seen it.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 05:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Imagewerx


Lots of remains of a plane that can and have been identified as being from an American Airlines Boeing 757.

According to the media, government sources and yet for some of these remains of the plane you can easily pick up them with your bare hands imagine that.

Compare that crash to other well known airline crashes. Where the pieces arent as small or hot.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 06:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Agent_USA_Supporter

That, was what is known as sarcasm. 9/11 truthers frequently claim that the Pentagon had a hi-tech, state of the art camera system. Those who actually worked at the Pentagon or other DoD office buildings, know better.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 06:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Agent_USA_Supporter

Please show us another crash site where an airliner slammed into a reinforced concrete/masonary/steel and Kevlar reinforced building.

And, then, show us a timestamp at which wreckage was collected compared to the tables at which aluminum airliner wreckage gives off its heat.

In other words, just stop. you do not have the first clue about what you are talking about.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 06:50 AM
link   
a reply to: truth0rdie

No video exists of Cory Lidell's small plane slamming into the apartment building. So, using your logic that didn't happen either.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 08:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Agent_USA_Supporter

It was sarcasm. Just because it's the Pentagon doesn't mean it had top of the line cameras and recorders.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 08:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Agent_USA_Supporter

All crashes, regardless of how they crash leave small pieces you can easily carry by hand. That isn't proof of anything.



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 09:10 AM
link   
Anyone can see pictures of the plane in the wreckage of the pentagon. That proves there was no plane!



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 09:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Ah ha! Your statement merely solified my belief that the was no plane! Indeed, if a plane was there, why did it not disinigrate completely like all planes do?



posted on Jan, 24 2015 @ 09:31 AM
link   

edit on 1/24/2015 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 30 2015 @ 05:13 PM
link   
all it takes is a quick google search, you can see the pentagon had CCTV installed on top of the walls right above the impact point.

also, lets take a look at a very in depth analysis of the CCTV footage itself.

start watching from 18 mins 30 seconds.

prooves without a doubt the footage was tampered with.



Withholding vital evidence and manipulating evidence. Such a strange way to operate considering everything they tell us is the truth.



posted on Jan, 30 2015 @ 05:20 PM
link   
while on the subject of CCTV.

Theres no footage of any of the 19 hijackers. not a single tape which could be classed as evidence (date/timestamped etc).

how did 19 hijackers, steal 3 planes from 3 airports...and evade all the CCTV?

Where are they arrving?, did they drive there?, where are they boarding the planes?, where are they queing to board? getting their boarding passes?, showing their passports?, where are they in the lobbies and waiting lounges?

hijacking a plane still means they gotta board it just like any other passenger.

granted we have 1 tape which was released which can't even be used as evidence because there is no date/time stamp on it.

theres a reason they couldn't show this. because it can't be faked too many witnesses and members of the public to collaberate the story.

is the only evidence we have of these 19 terrorists some mugshots from the FBI?

edit on 30-1-2015 by SkuzzleButt because: (no reason given)

edit on 30-1-2015 by SkuzzleButt because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 30 2015 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: SkuzzleButt

The company I worked for on 9/11 was responsible for four checkpoints. Three of those had two lanes, with four cameras to a lane. Those cameras were over ten years old. Not one of them showed an accurate time stamp if it showed on at all. Almost half didn't even work.



new topics




 
13
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join