It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: teamcommander
They left DNA samples in the cars, hotel rooms, and apartments they used, as stated above.
As for the names on the manifest, they were there, they were removed by the media when the manifests were released. The original manifest showed them on it, as did the first ones released.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: the2ofusr1
I don't think you understood what I said.
I said it wouldn't be wise to reveal to the world what their cameras were able to record. You know where they are positioned and what their blind spots may be.
I never said anything about pictures of the building or how the pentagon is laid out. I hope that clarifies what I said for you.
Many many people were given small amounts of explosives, told where/when/how to place them, do not ask any questions, do not talk to anyone, get the hell out of there and never come back!!!
originally posted by: danleonida
How, then, do you explain the installation of the large quantity of explosives required in a controlled demolition of this magnitude?
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: danleonida
How, then, do you explain the installation of the large quantity of explosives required in a controlled demolition of this magnitude?
There is zero evidence for any explosives being used.... you seem to think a flashmob installed explosives by the "James Bond" technique of sticking egg timers to the walls!
originally posted by: Variable
a reply to: peacefulpete
And we're talking about a supposed plane attack here. Which validates that they should have been filming planes
Huh? what would filming the sky help with exactly? Let's think clearly and logically about that shall we? Pray tell, how would filming the sky help prevent a plane attack or be useful in any way? Please... why do people who have no job in security say things like this are "common sense." Common sense to who? To people who nothing about security? Well why would they know anything useful? Why does your opinion matter, and why do you think your opinion is "common"?
V