a reply to: r0xor
yeah man, thats it for the most part.
There was actually a group of the more moderate ones in the 70s who went to Jerusalem. They were met with VERY harsh receptions. Eventually the state
of Israel allowed them to stay as Israeli citizens. They are not considered true Jews officially or something like that.
As far as the Khazar connection., There was some mixing between Khazars and Jews. BUT it was only the elite ruling class of Khazar society. ALSO, they
could only buy into a specific priesthood within Judaism. The other priesthoods and ruling classes of Judaism of the day were off limits to them. SO
they did buy into the lesser priesthood available.
Then Europe killed off many Jewish populations over many centuries. WW2 saw a huge decline in specific blood lines from the ME. Also, while in Europe
it wasnt uncommon for a young man to forge ahead to new population centers for business opportunities and in the process of doing that for these young
men to marry native Europeans and especially those of the upper classes. The mens families were then brought in from wherever they were before and
were integrated into the new communities.
This was even true for the US where young entrepreneurs like Levis and such would buy a pack of frontier provisions and head west to sell it off and
make his fortune. Then they would return and buy a cartful, then several and so on. In the process they would marry local women of social stature
comparable to their own. Jews are naturally a nomadic and adaptive people. Its not that modern Jews arent Jewish or true Jews because there is a
noticeable lack of purely Semitic blood. ALSO, many Jews who were in Spain left to the new world after the Spanish inquisition. They remained
secretive in their true loyalties and developed fraternities in the new world to maintain some of the last European golden age of Judaism which was
centered in Spain. They even developed their own language which was a fusion of Latin and Hebrew called "Ladino". Most dont know this but some notable
Conquistadors were closet Jews. There are many people in Spain that are Jewish and dont even know it. Their ancestors were forced converted by the
Oh another wrench to throw into their gears is to ask them how they distinguish between continental Africans whom they hate for selling them to
Europeans as slaves and colonial slaves that made it to the new world. They will go on to state that in Egypt they were the builders of everything we
describe as Egyptian. The point to make is that the descriptions of Egyptians arent about them. Egyptians KNEW continental Africans and there exist a
plethora of hieroglyphs speaking about Nubians and other peoples of Africa that various dynasties encountered and traded with. Black people were not
the original Egyptians as they say. They were the Nubians and other black peoples of Africa that Egypt was always well aware of and that Egypt made a
distinction for as separate people. So there is no way to tell a continental African from a supposed Hebrew African.
They will talk about native peoples in the Americas being a lost tribe and refer to the Olmec mother civilization. They will talk about the facial
features of the large Olmec heads. What they dont know is that there are many hundreds of groups native to the Americas and some were even white with
red hair, others were DARK skinned native Americans and that the facial features they describe are not unique to Africa. From Australia to Iberia,
Common traits like wide nostrils and bone structure were all over. My wifes Mexican family has a cousin who looks like an Olmec. He is VERY DAMN
Mexican not African.
You can also tell them that there is no native Caribbean tribes for the most part. Being an island population with an MANY international ports on each
Island, the native people dont exist anymore after prolonged mixing with everyone from Africans to Europeans. In the Dominican republic the Tainos are
extinct. In Puerto Rico the native people are no longer present. They mixed to a lesser extent but still profusely with Europeans from all over Europe
and African slaves. If he is Caribbean tell him to take a blood test. He will probably have MASSIVE amounts of white heritage to atone for. In some
cases more than 60% of his heritage will be European. Those are the best moments. They all start to look at him and see the devil in their
There is so much to work with when it comes to these Ninja Nazi power rangers that its actually allot of fun to shut them down. Have at it.
And remember to call the cops when you are done and tell them these weirdos hid a weapon or threatened to beat you into a coma with their shepherd
staffs. The cops will have to disperse them if people even just accuse them of being armed and menacing while spewing hate speech.
Trust me, there will be PLENTY of calls already by the time you are done with them.
Have a good one
Hold it down.
EDIT TO ADD:
I forgot to mention. If they give you an argument saying that you are not the original inhabitant of Europe because INDO-Europeans filled eastern
Europe after the ice age then they came over the Caucasus mountains....you tell them that PROTO-Europeans have an ancient origin as old as Modern
humans out of Africa. The fact is Proto-Europeans share a common ancestor with Continental Africans. That common ancestry was not inherited by one of
the out of Africa models of ancient migrations, but rather is as old as the oldest continental genealogy of modern humans in Africa. In fact, there is
the possibility to rationalize a separate INTO Africa model of migration predating all other migrations of at least a small group of this common
ancestor shared between Proto-Europeans and Continental Africans.
What is not being talked about is why the Royal families of Egypt all shared a common ancestor with 90% Of Iberians, 75% of French, 90% with people of
the UK and 90% with people of Ireland. In some regions of these countries a concentration of almost 99% of a common ancestor between them and the
ancient worlds Royalty exists. King tuts DNA is available for peer review. Its been analyzed by everyone worth a damn and their mothers. This is all a
known fact. A head of the Egyptian antiquities agency or what ever its called tried to stop the release of the teams findings. They said HELL NO, and
published it anyways. Then MANY others reviewed the DNA themselves.
The founding dynasties of the ancient world seeded in Africa were Proto-European.
African centrists will call that revisionist. They will also deny that some of the worlds best experts in DNA analysis came to the same results. King
tut could have been Irish.
I am willing to bet that certain deities like Quetzalcoatl and some Native American ruling dynasties like that of the Inca during the time of conquest
(which were light skinned red heads) were displaced Proto-Europeans from a yet unknown ancient migration into the Americas originating from the
eastern coast of south America near the Caribbean. There was once more land there. There was less distance between the eastern coast of SA and a
possible far spread island chain that ended not far off the western Cast of Africa. If there was a migration INTO Africa of a small group of sea
faring nomads they could have splintered with a group landing on SA.
edit on 12 23 2014 by tadaman because: (no reason given)