It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: StoutBroux
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Please give me data that shows NATO or U.S. has annexed another sovereign nation's territory into it's own in the recent past.
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
I just would like to see them stop taking territory of other nations.
Why doesn't America and NATO first stop taking territory of other nations which dont belong firstly? Russia has Rights to Ukraine America doesn't historically.
So we have to "annex" to be considered taking territory?
What territory did we take? What land is not US land?
originally posted by: Plugin
Putin just does the right things, now that does come with a cost...
The US must control the world basically for their own selfish interest and if you as a country got a problem with that expect sanctions or even worse (war), ... but better watch the video for the ''red pill''.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: Agent_USA_Supporter
There are plenty of Foreigners in the U.S. government. In fact, the ONLY position in government where being a natural born U.S. citizen is a requirement is the office of the President. So, your argument is moot.
the best you can do is go back to WW2. Thanks.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Agent_USA_Supporter
Except the Russian Ruble lost 50% of it's value.
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
I just would like to see them stop taking territory of other nations.
Why doesn't America and NATO first stop taking territory of other nations which dont belong firstly? Russia has Rights to Ukraine America doesn't historically.
Just look at the bases your country has build in, how do these bases bring peace and stability? these bases are nothing more then are showing threats to those country leaders and occupation.
I have to go with the Red, White and Blue on this one! Russia in complete chaos right now
Obama is a master at his craft, like it or not, anyone you say would be better at it, they have to show and prove that, let's stop the bias, look at the stats and give the credit where it is due, but of course many will never be honest..
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
the best you can do is go back to WW2. Thanks.
The same way some of your Republicans keep going back to the cold war ear mindset, i can see you didn't even tried on countering it thats not surprising.
But i will tell you this, the Balkans are loving the true benefits of being militarily occupied by NATO and America if thats not then they love the high pricing of the Balkan market goods its quite expensive that not even the Europeans would care on buying the imports.
No doubt Serbs,Croatians are already loving it just like the crazy EU loving lithuaniaians whom are enjoying there high jobless rate. And the ever growing poverty.
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
What territory did we take? What land is not US land?
Its not the that American forces its rather the occupation in the same countries during world war II Amertica it promised it would leave once the reconstruction efforts were done with.
I am quite sure you haven't heard of the westren betrayal. The other fact is you seem to be avoiding how easily America is occupying Japan and telling them which laws there country should have with the NGOs guidance of course.
When you occupy countries in this case Japan lets say you dont have own the territory or rise your flag to show that you own them, as long you occupy and have puppet leaders that follow the occupation country rule.
Thus its always not about territories but military occupation under by the claims of protection tell me you think that the Iraqis felt more safer when America occupied them?