It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Please give me data that shows NATO or U.S. has annexed another sovereign nation's territory into it's own in the recent past.
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
I just would like to see them stop taking territory of other nations.
Why doesn't America and NATO first stop taking territory of other nations which dont belong firstly? Russia has Rights to Ukraine America doesn't historically.
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: 31Bravo
The majorly of people in Eastern Europe dont want to see this happen, also if America controls the world are you aware that the Saudi regime and Sunni, Islamists would control there parts to.
And? What about China's interests? What about Irans interests?
I wonder how many Americans feel about the Saudis contorting the world with America after they take out Russia? the same middle eastern power house that has aided terrorist groups for decades.
I don't understand what you mean by this? Please clarify.edit on 22-12-2014 by 31Bravo because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
America You have million of issues why cant your elitist puppet leaders leave the world and Eastern Europe alone? that part of the world isn't yours nor is it your playground.
So, the posters here who are Anti-Obama, by your logic, must also be Anti-America?
So if Obama doesn’t appear interested in the job of president, what does he do day after day?
Well, he takes his meetings just like any other president would, though even then, he seems to lack a certain focus and on a few occasions, actually leaves with the directive that be given a summary of the meeting at a later date. I hear he plays a lot of golf, and watches a lot of television — ESPN mainly. I’ll tell you this — if you want to see President Obama get excited about a conversation, turn it to sports. That gets him interested. You start talking about Congress, or some policy, and he just kinda turns off. It’s really very strange. I mean, we were all led to believe that this guy was some kind of intellectual giant, right? Ivy League and all that. Well, that is not what I saw. Barack Obama doesn’t have a whole lot of intellectual curiosity. When he is off script, he is what I call a real “slow talker.” Lots of ummms, and lots of time in between answers where you can almost see the little wheel in his head turning very slowly. I am not going to say the president is a dumb man, because he is not, but yeah, there was a definite letdown when you actually hear him talking without the script.
That sounds like you are calling Obama stupid to me.
No — I am not going to call him stupid. He just doesn’t strike me as particularly smart. Bill Clinton is a smart guy — he would run intellectual circles around Barack Obama. And Bill Clinton loved the politics of being president. Obama seems to think he shouldn’t have to be bothered, which has created a considerable amount of conflict among his staff.
So how bad are things at the White House these days?
I don’t know about right now, because I have not been there in over a month. But I still hear things, and I know what it was like when I left. It’s not good. As bad as it might look to voters based on what they do know, it’s much worse. The infighting is off the charts. You got a Chief of Staff who despises cabinet members, advisors who despise the Chief of Staff, a President and First Lady having their own issues…
www.lewrockwell.com...
A good number of people support Obama in the United States.
to want the Russian people to be prosperous and happy without approving of their leader.
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
It seems to me that CNN forget to mention how Putin outclassed Obama and the NeoCons from intervening into Syria while being an class chess master, while at the same time America had started demonizing Russia even during the winter games.
Actually, the very definition of Annex means to make it part of your own territory. I see no Eastern Euorpean nations that are State number 51 of the U.S., or extended territory of Britain or Greece. Having a military presence on a nation's soil does not mean the nation belongs to the place the military bases come from.
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
Forcing Eastern European countries to join NATO and into the EU Empire is just like annexing. At the same time claiming that the reason NATO and US are there is to provide peace and stability is rather a laughable joke.
The US got everything they wanted out of the Syria situation.
Please give me data that shows NATO or U.S. has annexed another sovereign nation's territory into it's own in the recent past.
Japan doesn't belong to the US, and there are military bases here. Latvia doesn't belong to the US, and there is a military presence there. Text
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
Please give me data that shows NATO or U.S. has annexed another sovereign nation's territory into it's own in the recent past.
There you go...
Source
...or were you under the impression it`s different because it`s twisted in the Western media as being different ?