It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
bilking the poor out of money
If he were to be correct about one person, that changes nothing.
The only difference is the topics of the material he is peddling.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: noeltrotsky
I think when you start claiming pretty wild things about living people then you have a responsibility to be able to prove those claims. I believe English common law calls it slander if you can't prove your claims then it is punishable...and rightly so.
& yet none of these people have taken him to court...
Make of that what you will.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
David Icke has been spot on and I am starting to believe that it is so embedded in the whole establishment, if the truth is ever exposed, it will be their downfall; hence the delay of any inquiry.
originally posted by: angelchemuel
I haven't bothered reading all of this thread....the FACT that Icke worked at the BBC is enough for me to know where he got his info from all those years ago....so why didn't he go public then? Was that why he had to 'leave' the BBC?
To answer your question....no it would not make me consider any of his other claims.....most were made way before he did...and his 'reptilian' and 'moon' stuff is just a load of nonsense to cover his back from being 'eliminated'.