 |
|
Topic started on 2-6-2003 @ 12:01 PM by The all seing eye
|
could find something. because the mars lander will be on mars in 6 months lands on mars at 2.00am cristmas day.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-6-2003 @ 09:37 PM by who
|
I cant wait to see what it finds out, NASA is also sending a probe shortly after the Euro one gets there. I hope they show everything they find,
although I have my doubts.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-6-2003 @ 10:59 AM by astrocreep
|
I really hope they understand the difference between feet and meters this time.  I mean it ain't rocket science..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-6-2003 @ 11:09 AM by observer
|
  The most ridiculous mistake to happen in Space science EVER !!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-6-2003 @ 03:58 PM by Leveller
|
news.bbc.co.uk...
Take off delayed due to bad weather.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-6-2003 @ 05:22 PM by MKULTRA
|
 I really hope they understand the difference between feet and meters this time. 
Yeah, I believe their explanation on that one. They really do think we're idiots, to believe that.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2003 @ 10:16 AM by nepok
|
My thoughts are that the last probe did land successfully and we were told otherwise. By telling the public that it crashed and they lost
communications to the probe - this would keep the meia and the public from distubing NASA and they can conduct there research in secrecy. It had to
have been a coverup - NASA is not that dumb and besides they have one of the if not the highest ISO standards. Any work that is performed is not only
done with the highest scrutiny, all their work is double checked. To miss something as stupid as metric vs asa measurements is just mooronic. That
would be like stating that the probe was upside down during launch and crashed in to the earth.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2003 @ 10:20 AM by heelstone
|
Yay. More useless probes.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-10-2003 @ 06:21 PM by who
|
I dont think they could be called "useless probes" without knowing everything they are doing up there. It would be great if we could see live
streaming video that is actually live and unedited. I realize this is next to impossible, but it would be really cool. I dont think the other probe
crashed either, there is no way something that stupid could happen, Nepok is right.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-10-2003 @ 01:58 PM by Crowley
|
Well, that's what happens when you have 2 different firm's working on the software for the probe. Lack of communication... I dont think NASA would
cover-up a successful mission to mars... especially with the funding they need.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-12-2003 @ 09:05 AM by Genya
|
Good one Observer!! Mind you, Hubble caused a few red faces too, didn't it?
news.bbc.co.uk...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-12-2003 @ 10:23 AM by genesiss
|
i have got to say that unless the life is microscopic fungus or something to that degree they will not release any information that may cause conflict
or public arguement,, religion is still very strong,, when we admit to any indication there ever was intelligent life anywhere except from us there
will be mass hysteria in the religous media groups
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |