It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Can you provide me with links to the original hypothesis and the normal line of inquire that says that evolution is a fact.
No but I will say that if you do a study on the history of the speed of light you will find that it does not seem to be constant , and it would seem that it is derived at by a decision at the time it is published that varies over time .
You would think with all of the problems that some models have with actual data to project accurately they might set them aside
The fact that Govt's give large grants for industry to develop alternative energy sources .A quick search and you can find ow Obama gave millions toward solar power that flopped and folded quicker then the funds could have been used.
It resembles more like a money laundering scheme then anything else
All helped by what seems to be a body of scientist to make the data say what it has to say to perpetuate the scam .
He may be sponserd by oil .We know that 350.org is from their links .The climate gate emails tell a different story as well as Micheal Mans refusal to supply the data because Steve Mcintyre would only find fault with it . Well dauh.
It seems that MM spliced temperature records to proxy data without mentioning that fact and created the famous hockey stick .
climateaudit.org... One of many posts that looks deep into the MM story . a reply to: rnaa
In today’s post, I’ll discuss another misrepresentation in Mann’s Statement of Claim, one in which Mann bizarrely misrepresented the nature of his own research, falsely claiming credit for being “one of the first” to “document” the increase in 20th century temperatures. This particular false claim was in the same paragraph as Mann’s false claim to have received a Nobel prize. While the latter false claim has received widespread and well-deserved derision, Mann’s false description of the nature of his research has thus far passed without comment, an oversight that I will try to remedy in today’s post, which is part of a series of articles on various untrue statements by Mann in his pleadings in Mann v Steyn et al. For previous articles, se
Aliens by definition are extraterrestrial and are neither inter-dimensional nor supernatural.... This is just the type of quackery mentioned in the OP made all the more hilarious when you attempt to act asthough it's not. 'hey I'm a christian and I believe they exist, but only if I change the definition to fit my belief in a god'...
My objection is to the corruption of science and disinformation which is tantamount to fraud. Ken Ham is a fraud.
I will decide where and what I read . Example . Measuring the PH of something is either alkaline or acidic .It is either more or less unless it's neutral . That means not acidic or not alkaline . How is it possible to say that something is more acidic when it is alkaline .But coming from scientist we might get the impression that our oceans are becoming more acidic and we should act right now even when the oceans are alkaline in PH . Maybe that is why they need to make up data instead of using the tools we have been using all along .And if those tools are not good enough then the data they collect and used in many papers should be redone or just thrown out .
No more then I could understand someone being 2 months pregnant being less pregnant then someone who is 7 months pregnant . The difference between the two is there is no states of neutral in pregnancy , you either are or you are not .In PH you are either 1 of 3 states . When you are in the neutral phase you can not be more or less of the other two states which are acidic or alkaline . More or less acidic yes ,more or less alkaline , yes .What is in between the two states is neither of the two . But I will bite you tell me as you must know because I have never took the psychology of PH